View
12
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
ÒPTIC O ÒPTICA
ÓPTICO U ÓPTICA OPTOMETRISTA
BIBLIOGRAFIA / BIBLIOGRAFÍA:
Principios de Óptica Fisiológica e Instrumental.
REFERENCIAS
1. Justiniano Casas. Óptica; 1985.
2. Pedro Jiménez-Landi-Martinez, Introducción al estudio de los Instrumentos
Ópticos; 1985.
3. Hecht-Zajac. Óptica;1988.
4. M. Martinez Corral, Walter D. Furlan, Amparo Pons, Genaro Saavedra.
Instrumentos ópticos y optométricos. Teoría y Práctica; 1998.
5. Dra Cinta Puell Marín. Óptica Fisiológica. El sistema óptico del ojo y la
visión binocular; 2006.
6. C.Hernández, B. Domenech, C. Vázquez, C. Illueca. Óptica Geométrica:
Teoría y cuestiones; 1999.
Anatomía e Histología ocular.
REFERENCIAS
1. Moore KL, y Dalley II, Arthur F. Anatomía con orientación médica. 5ª ed:
Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2007.
2. Duke-Elder SyWKCISD-Ee. THE ANATOMY OF THE VISUAL SYSTEM.
SYSTEM OF OPHTHALMOLOGY. San Luis: The C.V. Mosby Company; 1961.
3. Adler: Fisiología del ojo: Elsevier; 2004.
4. Davson He. THE EYE. Nueva York.: Academic Press, Inc.; 1969, 1970.
5. Fine BSyYM. OCULAR HISTOLOGY. Nueva York.: A text and Atlas. Harper &
Row.; 1972.
6. Davson H. PHYSIOLOGY OF THE EYE. Nueva York.: Academic Press, Inc;
1972.
7. Hogan MJ, Alvarado, J.A. y Weddell, J.E. HISTOLOGY OF THE HUMAN EYE.
Filadelfia.: W.B. Saunders Company.; 1971.
8. Brindley GS. PHISIOLOGY OF THE RETINA VISUAL PATHWAY. Ltd.
Londres.: Edward Arnold (Publishers); 1970.
Percepción Visual.
REFERENCIAS:
1. Artigas JM. Optica Fisiológica: Psicofísica de La Visión. McGraw-Hill,
Interamericana de España; 1995.
2.
Universidad de Alicante; 2014. http://rua.ua.es/dspace/handle/10045/52126.
3. Capilla P. Percepción Visual: Psicofísica, Mecanismos y Modelos. Editorial
Médica Panamericana; 2019.
4.
http://cataleg.uoc.edu/record=b1000046~S1*cat. Accessed May 18, 2020.
5. Schwartz SH. Visual Perception: A Clinical Orientation. Vol 30.
(Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed.). McGraw-Hill; 2010.
doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00768.x
6. González Gómez E. Guía básica de conceptos de radiometría y fotometría.
Campos electromagnéticos - Óptica. 2006:1-41.
7. Laming D. Visual adaptation—a reinterpretation: discussion. J Opt Soc Am A.
2013;30(10):2066. doi:10.1364/josaa.30.002066
8. Fundamentos de Visión Binocular. AM. Pons, FM. Martinez Verdú.
Publicacions de la Universitat de València. 2004.
9. Fundamentos del ojo. Visión binocular. B. Evans. Elsevier España. 2006.
10. Binocular Vision. Blake R, Wilson H. Vision Res. 2011 April; 51(7): 754-770.
11. Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. Howard I, Rogers B. Oxford University Press.
1994.
12. Neural computations underlying depth perception. Anzai A., DeAngelis G. Curr
Opin Neurobiol. 2010 June; 20(3): 367-375.
13. Stereoscopic Vision. Julesz B. Vision Res. 1986; 26(9): 1601-1612.
Defectos refractivos.
REFERENCIAS:
1. Hirsch MJ: Predictability of refraction at age 14 on the basis of testing at age 6:
Interim report n the Ojai longitudinal study of refraction. Am J Optom
1964;41:567-573
2. OPTOMETRÍA, Principios básicos y aplicación clínica. Prof. Robert Montés-
Micó
3. Changes in refraction between the ages of 1 and 3 1/2 years.Ingram RM, Barr
A.Br J Ophthalmol. 1979 May; 63(5):339-42
4. Axial growth and changes in lenticular and corneal power during
emmetropization in infants.Mutti DO, Mitchell GL, Jones LA, Friedman NE,
Frane SL, Lin WK, Moeschberger ML, Zadnik K. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
2005 Sep; 46(9):3074-80.
Agudeza visual.
REFERENCIAS:
1. Micó V. Agudeza visual, sensibilidad al contraste y deslumbramiento. En:
Montés-Micó R, ed. Optometría. Principios básicos y aplicación clínica.
Barcelona: Elsevier, 2011: 103-127.
2. Bailey IL. Visual acuity. En: Benjamin WJ, ed. B h’ f 2ª
ed. St. Louis: Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier, 2006: 217-246.
3. Lay M, Wickware E, Rosenfield M. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. En:
Rosenfield M, Logan N, eds. Optometry: science, techniques and clinical
management. 2ª ed. Edinburgh: Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier, 2009: 173-
185.
4. Martín Herranz R, Vecilla Antolínez G. Manual de Optometría. 2ª ed. Madrid:
Editorial Médica Panamericana, 2018.
5. Sjöstrand J, Laatikainen L, Hirvelä H, Popovic Z, Jonsson R. The decline in
visual acuity in elderly people with healthy eyes or eyes with early age-related
maculopathy in two Scandinavian population samples. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;
89: 116–123.
Pérdida de Visión no orgánica y simulación
REFERENCIAS:
1. Escobar, J.I., Hoyos-Nervi, C., Gara, M. Medically Unexplained Physical
Symptoms in Medical Practice: A Psychiatric Perspective. Environmental
Health Perspectives. 2002;110:631-636.
2. N wh ’ ? A O h h
2011;151:569–571. 3.- Wise MG, Ford C. Factitious disorders. Primary Care.
1999;26:315–26.
3. Hurwitz TA. Somatization and Conversion Disorder. Can. J. Psychiatry
2004;49:172-78.
4. Gaedicke A, González-Hernández J. Somatización y trastorno conversivo:
clínica, fisiopatología, evaluación y tratamiento. Memoriza.2010;6:1-14.
5. Lim S.A., Siatkowski R.M., Farris B.K. Functional visual loss in adults and
children patient characteristics, management, and outcomes. Ophthalmology.
2005;112(10):1821-8.
6. Beatty S. Non-organic visual loss. Postgrad Med J.1999;75:201-7.
7. Muñoz-Hernández AM, García-Catalán R, Santos-Bueso E, López-Abad C, Gil-
De-Bernabé JG, Díaz-Valle D, Benítez-Del-Castillo-Sánchez JM, García-
Sánchez J. Simulation in ophthalmology. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2011;86:424-
5.
8. Bengtzen R, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Newman NJ, Biousse V. The "sunglasses
sign" predicts nonorganic visual loss in neuro-ophthalmologic practice.
Neurology. 2008;70(3):218-21.
9. Ramke J, Brian G, Naduvilath T, Lee L, Qoqonokana MQ. Prevalence and
causes of blindness and low vision revisited after 5 years of eye care in Timor-
Leste. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012;19(2):52-7.
10. Haller H, Cramer H, Lauche R, Dobos G. Somatoform disorders and medically
unexplained symptoms in primary care. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(16):279-87.
11. Vuilleumier P, Chicherio C, Assal F, Schwartz S, Slosman D, Landis T.
Functional neuroanatomical correlates of hysterical sensorimotor loss. Brain.
2001;124:1077-90.
12. Taich A, Crowe S, Kosmorsky GS, Traboulsi EI. Prevalence of psychosocial
disturbances in children with nonorganic visual loss. J AAPOS. 2004;8(5):457-
61.
13. Barris, M.C., Kaufman, D.I., Barberio, D. Visual impairment in hysteria.
Documenta Ophthalmologica.1192;82:369-382.
14. Takahashi M, Kunikata H, Kato K, Kawakami A, Nakazawa T. Familial
Background Factors And Their Association With Non-Organic Visual Loss. Clin
Ophthalmol. 2019;13:2059-2061.
15. Chen CS, Lee AW, Karagiannis A, Crompton JL, Selva D. Practical clinical
approaches to functional visual loss. J Clin Neurosci. 2007;14(1):1-7.
16. Zinkernagel SM, Mojon DS. Distance doubling visual acuity test: a reliable test
for nonorganic visual loss. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
2009;247(6):855-8.
17. Sitko KR, Peragallo JH, Bidot S, Biousse V, Newman NJ, Bruce BB. Pitfalls in
the Use of Stereoacuity in the Diagnosis of Nonorganic Visual Loss.
Ophthalmology. 2016;123(1):198-202.
18. Miller NR. Neuro-ophthalmologic manifestations of psychogenic disease. Semin
Neurol. 2006;26(3):310-20.
19. Rover, L., Bach, M. Pattern electroretinogram plus visual evoked potential: a
decisive test in patients suspected of malingering. Documenta
Ophthalmologica.1987; 66, 245–251.
20. Newman N, Biousse VR. Diagnostic approach to vision loss. Continuum
Minneap Minn 2014;20:785–815.
21. Hsu JL, Haley CM, Foroozan R. Target visual field: a technique to rapidly
demonstrate nonorganic visual field constriction. Arch Ophthalmol
2010;128:1220–1222.
22. Bruce BB, Newman NJ. Functional visual loss. Neurol Clin. 2010; 28:789–802.
23. Hallett, M., Stone, J., Carson, A. Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Vol. 139 (3rd
series).Functional Neurologic Disorders. 2016. Elsevier.
24. Scott JA, Egan RA. Prevalence of organic neuro-ophthalmologic disease in
patients with functional visual loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(5):670-5.
25. Rebolleda G, Muñoz-Negrete F. Protocolos en neuroftalmología. Sociedad
Española de Oftalmología. 2010
Refracción objetiva.
REFERENCIAS:
1. American Academy of Ophthalmology. Óptica clínica. Elsevier; 2012.
2. 2.Atchison DA. Optics of the human eye. In: Encyclopedia of Modern Optics.
2018.
3. B j W B h’ C R f B h’ C R f 2006
4. B I B I B ’ B w h-
Heinemann; 2003. 366 p.
5. Carlson NB, Kurtz D. Clinical procedures for ocular examination. McGraw-
Hill, Medical Pub. Div; 2004. 487 p.
6. Davidoff J. Optometry: Science, Techniques and Clinical Management. Optom-
J Am Optom Assoc. 2010;
7. Davies, L.N.; Mallen, E.A.; Wolffsohn, J.S.; Gilmartin, B. Clinical evaluation of
the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100 K autorefractor.
Optom. Vis. Sci., 2003, vol. 80, p. 320-24.
8. Henson, B. Optometric instrumetation, ed. Oxford Butterworth-Heinemann, 2nd
ed. 1996. ISBN 0750607270.
9. Martinez, M.; Furlan, W.; Pons, A.; Saavedra, G. Instrumentos Ópticos y
Optométricos. Teoría y práctica. Universidad de Valencia, 1998, capítulo 11.5:
Optómetros objetivos automáticos (autorefractómetros).
10. - R A C A C h
O Elsevier; 2011.
11. Atchison DA. Optics of the human eye. In: Encyclopedia of Modern Optics.
2018.
12. Del Pilar Cacho M, García-Muñoz Á, García-Bernabeu JR, López A.
Comparison between MEM and Nott dynamic retinoscopy. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;
Refracción subjetiva. Refracción en casos especiales
REFERENCIAS
1. Soeters N, Muijzer MB, Molenaar J, Godefrooij DA, Wisse RPL. Autorefraction
Versus Manifest Refraction in Patients With Keratoconus. Journal of refractive
surgery. 2018;34(1):30-34.
2. Jinabhai A, O'Donnell C, Radhakrishnan H. A comparison between
subjective refraction and aberrometry-derived refraction in keratoconus patients
and control subjects. Curr Eye Res. 2010;35(8):703-714.
3. Thibos LN, Horner D. Power vector analysis of the optical outcome of refractive
surgery. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery. 2001;27(1):80-85.
4. Micó V, Albarrán-Diego C, Thibos L. Power Vectors for the Management of
Astigmatism: From Theoretical to Clinical Applications. In: Buckley R, ed.
Astigmatism: Types, Diagnosis and Treatment Options: Nova Science
Publishers; 2014.
5. Gupta N, Wolffsohn JS, Naroo SA. Optimizing measurement of subjective
amplitude of accommodation with defocus curves. Journal of cataract and
refractive surgery. 2008;34(8):1329-1338.
6. Pieh S, Kellner C, Hanselmayer G, et al. Comparison of visual acuities at
different distances and defocus curves. Journal of cataract and refractive
surgery. 2002;28(11):1964-1967.
7. Fernández J, Rodríguez-Vallejo M, Tauste Francés A, Albarrán C, Basterra I,
Piñero DP. Fast Measure of Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity Defocus
Curves with an iPad Application. The Open Ophthalmology Journal.
2019;13:15-22.
8. Albarran-Diego C, Munoz G, Ferrer-Blasco T, Garcia-Lazaro S. Prevention of
hyperopic surprise after LASIK in patients with refractive multifocal intraocular
lenses. European journal of ophthalmology. 2011;21(6):826-829.
9. Albarran-Diego C, Munoz G, Ferrer-Blasco T. Subjective refraction before
LASIK enhancement in bioptics procedures with refractive multifocal
intraocular lenses. Journal of refractive surgery. 2011;27(8):556-557.
10. Munoz G, Albarran-Diego C, Sakla HF. Validity of autorefraction after cataract
surgery with multifocal ReZoom intraocular lens implantation. Journal of
cataract and refractive surgery. 2007;33(9):1573-1578.
11. Munoz G, Albarran-Diego C, Sakla HF. Autorefraction after multifocal IOLs.
Ophthalmology. 2007;114(11):2100.
12. Albarran-Diego C, Munoz G, Rohrweck S, Garcia-Lazaro S, Albero JR. Validity
of automated refraction after segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lens
implantation. International journal of ophthalmology. 2017;10(11):1728-1733.
13. Garzon N, Garcia-Montero M, Lopez-Artero E, Poyales F, Albarran-Diego C.
Influence of trifocal intraocular lenses on standard autorefraction and
aberrometer-based autorefraction. Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.
2019;45(9):1265-1274.
14. Montes-Mico R, Alio JL. Distance and near contrast sensitivity function after
multifocal intraocular lens implantation. Journal of cataract and refractive
surgery. 2003;29(4):703-711.
15. Montés-Micó R. Optometría: principios básicos y aplicación clínica. Elsevier,
editor. Barcelona; 2011. 416 p.
16. 2 B j W B h’ f 2 E H -Elseiver B,
editor. Philadelphia; 2006. 1712 p.
17. 3. Rosenfield, M; Logan N. Optometry: science, techniques and clinical
management. 2nd ed. Butterworth-Heinemann, editor. Oxford; 2009. 568 p.
18. Carlson, N; Kurtz, D; Heath, D; Hines C. Procedimientos clínicos en el examen
visual. Ediciones Génova SA, editor. Madrid; 1992. 251 p.
19. Martín, R; Vecilla G. Manual de optometría. Panamericana EM, editor.
Madrid; 2018. 475 p.
20. Bennet, R; Rabbetts R. Clinical Visual Optics. 3th ed. Buttherworth-
Heinemann, editor. Oxford; 1998.
21. Furlan, W; García-Monreal, J; Muñoz-Escrivá L. Fundamentos de optometría.
Refracción ocular. Valencia PU de, editor. Valencia; 2000. 274 p.
22. Borrás-García, R et al. Manual de exámenes clínicos. UPC, editor. Barcelona;
1993. 236 p.
23. Grosvenor T. Optometría de atención primaria. Elsevier-Masson, editor.
Barcelona; 2005. 736 p.
24. Fannin, T; Grosvenor T. Clinical optics. Butterworth-Heinemann, editor.
Boston; 1996.
25. Montés-Micó R. Optometría: aspectos avanzados y consideraciones especiales.
Elsevier, editor. Barcelona; 2012. 344 p.
26. Rosenbloom, A; Morgan M. Vision and Aging. Buttherworth-Heinemann, editor.
St. Louis; 2007.
27. McNaughton J. Evaluación en baja visión. Elsevier Masson, editor. Barcelona;
2006.
28. MacNaughton J. Evaluación en baja visión. Barcelona: Masson, Elsevier; 2006.
237 p.
29. Fannin, T; Grosvenor T. Óptica clínica. 2 a ed. Ediciones Omega SA, editor.
2007.
Examen de la acomodación y la binocularidad.
REFERENCIAS:
1. Scheiman M, Wick B. Clinical Management of Binocular Vision. Philadelphia:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2014.
2. Cacho-Martínez P, García-Muñoz A. Evaluación clínica de la visión binocular.
In: Montés-Micó R, editor. Principios básicos y aplicación clínica. Barcelona:
Elsevier España S.L. , 2011.
3. Ciuffreda K. Accommodation, the Pupil and Presbyopia. In: Benjamin W, editor.
Borish´s Clinical Refraction St. Louis: Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier, 2006.
4. Saladin J. Phorometry and Stereopsis. In: Benajamin W, editor. Borish´s
Clinical Refraction St. Louis: Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier, 2006.
5. Morgan MW. Analysis of clinical data. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom.
1944;21:477-491.
6. Cantó-Cerdán M, Cacho-Martínez P, García-Muñoz A. Measuring the
heterophoria: Agreement between two methods in non-presbyopic and
presbyopic patients. J Optom. 2018;11:153-159.
7. Facchin A, Maffioletti S. Comparison, within-session repeatability and
normative data of three phoria tests. J Optom. 2020. Doi:
10.1016/j.optom.2020.05.007.
8. Lyon DW, Goss DA, Horner D, Downey JP, Rainey B. Normative data for
modified Thorington phorias and prism bar vergences from the Benton-IU study.
Optometry. 2005;76:593-599.
9. Wajuihian SO. Normative values for clinical measures used to classify
accommodative and vergence anomalies in a sample of high school children in
South Africa. J Optom. 2019;12:143-160.
10. Lança CC, Rowe FJ. Measurement of fusional vergence: a systematic review.
Strabismus. 2019;27:88-113.
11. Cacho-Martínez P, García-Muñoz Á, Ruiz-Cantero M. Do we really know the
prevalence of accomodative and nonstrabismic binocular dysfunctions? J
Optom. 2010;3:185-197.
Atención optométrica en condiciones especiales.
REFERENCIAS
1. Atowa UC, Wajuihian SO, Hansraj R. A review of paediatric vision screening
protocols and guidelines. Int J Ophthalmol. 2019;12(7):1194-1201.
2. Montés-Micó R. Optometria : Aspectos Avanzados y Consideraciones
Especiales. Elsevier; 2011.
3. Chhablani PP, Kekunnaya R. Neuro-ophthalmic manifestations of prematurity.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62(10):992-995.
4. Anstice NS, Thompson B. The measurement of visual acuity in children: an
evidence-based update. Clin Exp Optom. 2014;97(1):3-11.
5. Thomas J, Rajashekar B, Kamath A, Gogate P. Diagnostic accuracy and
agreement between visual acuity charts for detecting significant refractive
errors in preschoolers. Clin Exp Optom. 2019.
6. Antona B. Procedimientos Clínicos Para La Evaluación de La Visión Binocular.
2a Edicion. (Panamerica E medica, ed.).; 2018.
7. Wolski L, Leroi I, Regan J, et al. The need for improved cognitive, hearing and
vision assessments for older people with cognitive impairment: a qualitative
study. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):328.
8. Eperjesi F, Bartlett H, Dunne M. Amsler grid. In: Ophthalmic Clinical
Procedures. Elsevier; 2007:156-157.
9. Wimalasundera N, Stevenson VL. Cerebral palsy. Pract Neurol.
2016;16(3):184-194.
10. Deramore Denver B, Froude E, Rosenbaum P, Wilkes-Gillan S, Imms C.
Measurement of visual ability in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic
review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58(10):1016-1029.
11. Gulati S, Sondhi V. Cerebral Palsy: An Overview. Indian J Pediatr.
2018;85(11):1006-1016.
Lentes oftálmicas para la compensación de defectos refractivos y de la
binocularidad.
REFERENCIAS:
1. Libro Blanco de la visión en España 2018. Fedao y Visión y vida, 2019.
2. Miller, D.A. Huygens wave propagation principle corrected. Optics
letters.1991; 16(18), 1370-1372
3. Tomany, S. C., Cruickshanks, K. J., Klein, R., Klein, B. E., Knudtson, M. D.
Sunlight and the 10-year incidence of age-related maculopathy: the Beaver Dam
Eye Study. Archives of ophthalmology,2004; 122(5), 750-757.
4. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. ICNIRP
guidelines on limits of exposure to incoherent visible and infrared
radiation. Health Physics,2013; 105(1), 74-96.
5. Sears, F. W., Ford, A. L., & Freedman, R. A. Física universitaria con física
moderna (Vol. 2). Pearson educación. 2005.
6. Marcos, S., Burns, S. A., Moreno-Barriusop, E., Navarro, R. A new approach to
the study of ocular chromatic aberrations. Vision Research, 1999; 39(26), 4309-
4323.
7. Kwan, A., Dudley, J., Lantz, E. Who really discovered Snell's
law?. Physics World, 2002; 15(4), 64.
8. Brewster, D., Bache, A. D. A Treatise on Optics...: First American Edition, with
an Appendix, Containing an Elementary View of the Application of Analysis to
Reflexion and Refraction. Carey, Lea, & Blanchard;1833.
9. Meister, D. J., Fisher, S. W. Progress in the spectacle correction of presbyopia.
Part 1: Design and development of progressive lenses. Clinical and
experimental optometry, 2008; 91(3), 240-250.
10. Mahajan, V. N. Optical imaging and aberrations: Ray geometrical optics
1988 (Vol. 45). SPIE press.
11. Ospina, C. P. Fundamentos en lentes oftálmicos. Universidad de La Salle. 2009
Brooks CW. Essentials for ophthalmic lens work. Elservier Health Sciences.
2003.
12. Brooks CW, Borish I. System for ophthalmic dispensing-e-book. Elsevier Health
Sciences. 2006.
13. Cotter S. Prismas ópticos: aplicaciones clínicas. Ediciones Mosby. Madrid.
1996.
14. Fanin T, Grosvenor T. Óptica clínica. 2ª ed. Butterworth-Heinemann. New York.
1996.
15. Iglesias JF, Rodríguez A. Óptica oftálmica. Teoría y problemas. ICM. Madrid
2018
16. Jalie M. Ophthalmic lenses & dispensing. 3ªed. Butterworth Heinemann.
Oxford. 2008.
17. W k f KG W k f KG B ’ h h prescription work.
Butterworth Heinemann. 1994.
Lentes de contacto.
REFERENCIAS:
1. Van der Worp E, Bornman D, Ferreira DL, Faria-Ribeiro M, Garcia-Porta N,
2. González-Meijome JM. Modern scleral contact lenses: A review. Contact Lens
Anterior Eye 2014;37:240-50.
3. Worp E Van Der. A Guide to Scleral Lens Fitting (2nd edition). Pacific Un.
Common Knowledge.; 2016.
4. Schornack MM. Scleral lenses: A literature review. Eye Contact Lens 2015;41.
5. Povedano-Montero FJ, Álvarez-Peregrina C, Hidalgo Santa Cruz F, Villa-
Collar C, Sánchez Valverde J. Bibliometric Study of Scientific Research on
Scleral Lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2018;44 Suppl 2:S285-91.
6. Pearson RM. The Sämisch case and the Müllers of Wiesbaden. Optom Vis Sci
2009;86:157-64.
7. Fick AE. A Contact Lens. Arch Ophthalmol 1888;19:215-26.
8. PEARSON RM. Kalt, Keratoconus, and the Contact Lens. Optom Vis Sci
1989;66:643-6.
9. R Ef N H h f A ü ’
dissertation on contact lenses. Surv Ophthalmol 1989;34:133-41.
10. Ezekiel D. Gas permeable haptic lenses. J Br Contact Lens Assoc 1983;6:158-
61. Swarb k H W G O’ C h k
Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75(11):791-799
11. Alharbi A, Swarbrick HA. The effects of overnight orthokeratology lens wear on
corneal thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(6):2518-2523
12. Jessen G. Orthophocus techniques. Contacto. 1962;6:200-204
13. Grant SC, May CH. Orthokeratology – A therapeutic approach to contact lens
procedures. Contacto. 1970;4:3-16
14. Walline JJ, Holden BA, Bullimore MA, Rah MJ, Asbell PA. Barr JT, Caroline
PJ, Cavanagh HD, Despotidis N, Desmond F, Koffler BH, Reedr K, Swarbrick
HA, Wohl LG. The current state of corneal reshaping. Eye Contact Lens.
2005;31(5):209-214
15. Mountford J, Ruston D, Dave T. Orthokeratology: Principles and practice.
Edinburgh. Scotland: Ed. Butterworth-Heinemann. 2004
16. Van der Worp E, Bornman D, Ferreira DL, Faria-Ribeiro M, Garcia-Porta N,
González-Meijome JM. Modern scleral contact lenses: A review. Contact Lens
Anterior Eye 2014;37:240-50.
17. Worp E Van Der. A Guide to Scleral Lens Fitting (2nd edition). Pacific Un.
Common Knowledge.; 2016.
18. Schornack MM. Scleral lenses: A literature review. Eye Contact Lens 2015;41.
Sensibilidad al contraste.
REFERENCIAS
1. Alexander KR, McAnany JJ. Determinants of contrast sensitivity for the
Tumbling E and Landolt C. Optom Vis Sci. 2010;87(1):28–36.
2. Hitchcock EM, Dick RB, Krieg EF. Visual contrast sensitivity testing: a
comparison of two F.A.C.T. test types. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2004;26(2):271–7.
3. Howell ER, Mitchell DE, Keith CG. Contrast thresholds for sine gratings of
children with amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983 Jun;24(6):782–7.
4. Rodríguez-Vallejo M, Llorens-Quintana C, Furlan WD, Monsoriu JA. Visual
acuity and contrast sensitivity screening with a new iPad application. Displays.
2016 Sep;44:15–20.
5. Westheimer G. Modulation thresholds for sinusoidal light distributions on the
retina. J Physiol. 1960;152(1):67–74.
6. Campbell FW, Green DG. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.
J Physiol. 1965;181(3):576–93.
7. Blakemore C, Campbell FW. On the existence of neurones in the human visual
system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J
Physiol. 1969;203:237–60.
8. De Valois KK. Spatial frequency adaptation can enhance contrast sensitivity.
Vision Res. 1977;17(9):1057–65.
9. Itti L, Koch C, Braun J. Revisiting spatial vision: toward a unifying model. J Opt
Soc Am A. 2000;17(11):1899.
10. Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ. The design of a new letter chart for measuring
contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Sci. 1988;2(3):187–99.
11. Arden GB. The importance of measuring contrast sensitivity in cases of visual
disturbance. Br J Ophthalmol. 1978 Apr;62(4):198–209.
12. Ginsburg A. A new contrast sensitivity vision test chart. Am J Optom Physiol
Opt. 1984;61(6):403–7.
13. Campbell FW, Robson JG. Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of
gratings. J Physiol. 1968;197(3):551–66.
14. Parish DH, Sperling G. Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies,
noise, and the efficiency of letter discrimination. Vision Res. 1991;31(7–
8):1399–415.
15. McAnany JJ. The effect of exposure duration on visual acuity for letter optotypes
and gratings. Vision Res. 2014;105:86–91.
16. Jason McAnany J, Alexander KR, Lim JI, Shahidi M. Object frequency
characteristics of visual acuity. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(13):9534–
8.
17. Shah N, Dakin SC, Dobinson S, Tufail A, Egan CA, Anderson RS. Visual acuity
loss in patients with age-related macular degeneration measured using a novel
high-pass letter chart. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(10):1346–52.
18. Howland B, Ginsburg A, Campbell F. High-pass spatial frequency letters as
clinical optotypes. Vision Res. 1978;18(8):1063–6.
19. Leat SJ, Woo GC. The validity of current clinical tests of contrast sensitivity and
their ability to predict reading speed in low vision. Eye. 1997;11(6):893–9.
20. Pesudovs K, Hazel C, Doran R, Eliot D. The usefulness of Vistech and FACT
contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes
research. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(1):11–6.
21. Franco S, Silva AC, Carvalho AS, Macedo AS, Lira M. Comparison of the
VCTS-6500 and the CSV-1000 tests for visual contrast sensitivity testing.
Neurotoxicology. 2010;31(6):758–61.
22. Haughom B, Strand T-E. Sine wave mesopic contrast sensitivity -- defining the
normal range in a young population. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(2):176–82.
23. Rodríguez-Vallejo M, Remón L, Monsoriu JA, Furlan WD. Designing a new test
for contrast sensitivity function measurement with iPad. J Optom. 2015;8:101–
8.
24. Bühren J, Terzi E, Bach M, Wesemann W, Kohnen T. Measuring contrast
sensitivity under different lighting conditions: comparison of three tests. Optom
Vis Sci. 2006;83(5):290–8.
25. Colombo E, Issolio L, Santillán J, Aguirre R. What characteristics a clinical
CSF system has to have? Opt Appl. 2009;39(2):415–28.
26. Charlesworth JM, Davidson MA. Undermining a common language:
Smartphone applications for eye emergencies. Med Devices Evid Res.
2019;12:21–40.
27. Rodríguez-Vallejo M, Monsoriu JA, Furlan WD. Inter-display reproducibility of
contrast sensitivity measurement with iPad. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93(12):1532–
6.
28. Hohberger B, Laemmer R, Adler W, Juenemann AG, Horn FK. Measuring
contrast sensitivity in normal subjects with OPTEC 6500: influence of age and
glare. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245(12):1805–14.
29. Rabin J. Optical defocus: Differential effects on size and contrast letter
recognition thresholds. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35(2):646–8.
30. Holton H, Christiansen AB, Albeck MJ, Johnsen CR. The impact of light source
on discrimination ability in subjects with age-related macular degeneration.
Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89(8):779–84.
31. Fernández J, Rodríguez-Vallejo M, Tauste A, Albarrán C, Basterra I, Piñero D.
Fast measure of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity defocus curves with an
iPad application. Open Ophthalmol J. 2019;13(1):15–22.
32. Owsley C. Contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2003;16(2):171–8.
33. Ivers RQ, Macaskill P, Cumming RG, Mitchell P. Sensitivity and specificity of
tests to detect eye disease in an older population. Ophthalmology. 2001
May;108(5):968–75.
34. Woods RL, Strang NC, Atchison DA. Can we safely measure contrast sensitivity
without full optical correction?. Accessed 3/3/2020. Available at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265278242_Can_we_safely_measure_
contrast_sensitivity_without_full_optical_correction
35. Woods RL, Strang NC, Atchison DA. Measuring contrast sensitivity with
inappropriate optical correction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000;20(6):442–51.
36. Freeman RD, Thibos LN. Contrast sensitivity in humans with abnormal visual
experience. J Physiol. 1975;247(3):687–710.
37. Apkarian P, Tijssen R, Spekreijse H, Regan D. Origin of notches in CSF: optical
or neural? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28(3):607-12.
38. Tahir HJ, Parry NRA, Pallikaris A, Murray IJ. Higher-order aberrations
produce orientation-specific notches in the defocused contrast sensitivity
function. J Vis. 2009;9(7): 11.
Aberraciones Ópticas y caracterización de la calidad visual.
REFERENCIAS:
1. Piñero Llorens DP, Maldonado MJ. Aberrometría. En: Técnicas exploratorias
en oftalmología. Editores: Menezo Rozalén JL, España Gregori E. Espaxs.
Barcelona 2006.
2. Maeda N. Wavefront technology in ophthalmology. Curr Opin Ophthalmol
2001; 12: 294-9.
3. Applegate RA, Marcos S, Thibos LN. Aberrometry: clinical and research
applications. Optom Vis Sci 2003; 80: 85-6.
4. Plaza-Puche AB, Salerno LC, Versaci F, Romero D, Alio JL. Clinical evaluation
of the repeatability of ocular aberrometry obtained with a new pyramid
wavefront sensor. Eur J Ophthalmol 2019; 29: 585-592.
5. Thibos LN. Principles of Hartmann-Shack aberrometry. J Refract Surg 2000;
16: S563-5.
6. Burns SA. The spatially resolved refractometer. J Refract Surg 2000; 16: S566-9
7. Molebny VV, Panagopoulou SI, Molebny SV, Wakil YS, Pallikaris IG. Principles
of ray tracing aberrometry. J Refract Surg 2000; 16: S572-5.
8. Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Mierdel P, Krinke H-E, Seiler T. Principles of
Tscherning aberrometry. J Refract Surg 2000; 16: S570-1.
9. Martínez-Abad A, Piñero DP. New perspectives on the detection and
progression of keratoconus. Cataract Refract Surg 2017; 43: 1213-1227.
10. Alió JL, Piñero DP, Alesón A, Teus MA, Barraquer RI, Murta J, Maldonado MJ,
Castro de Luna G, Gutiérrez R, Villa C, Uceda-Montanes A. Keratoconus-
integrated characterization considering anterior corneal aberrations, internal
astigmatism, and corneal biomechanics. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 552-
68.
Evaluación y alteración de los reflejos pupilares.
REFERENCIAS:
1. Ross LHea. «Eye». Histology: a text and atlas (5th edición): Baltimore:
Williams & Wilkins.; 2006.
2. Adler: Fisiología del ojo: Elsevier; 2004.
3. Derrickson T-. Principios de Anatomía y Fisiología, 11ª edición2006.
4. Kanski JJ. Oftolmalogía clínica. 5ª ed.: Elsevier.
Evaluación de la visión cromática.
REFERENCIAS
1. Birch J. Diagnosis of Defective Colour Vision. 2nd edition. Oxford:Butterworth-
Heinemann, London. 2001
2. National Research Council (US) Committee on Vision. Procedures for Testing
Color Vision: Report of Working Group 41. Washington (DC): National
Academies Press (US).1981
3. Foster DH. (ed) Inherited and Acquired Color Vision Deficiencies. Fundamental
Aspects and Clinical Studies en Vision and Visual Dysfunction. Vol. 7. Cronly-
Dillon JR (ed). Macmillan press. London.1991
4. Capilla P. Percepción Visual. Psicofísica, Mecanismos y Modelos. Medica
Panamericana. Madrid.2019
5. Urtubia Vicario C. Neurobiología de la Visión. Universidad Politécnica de
Cataluña SL. Barcelona. 2005
6. de Fez D y Viqueira V. Fundamentos de Percepción Visual. Publicaciones
Universidad de Alicante. Alicante. 2014
7. Artigas JM, Capilla P, Felipe A y Pujol J. Óptica Fisiológica. Psicofísica de la
Visión. McGRAW Hill. Interamericana de España. Madrid.1995
8. Mollon JD, Pokorny J y Knoblauch K. Normal and Defective Colour Vision.
Oxford University Press.2003
Evaluación del campo visual y otras pruebas complementarias.
REFERENCIAS:
1. Johnson CA. Psycophysical factors that have been applied to clinical perimetry.
Vision Research 2013; 90: 25-31.
2. Johnson CA, Wall M, Thompson HS. A history of perimetry. Optom Vis Sci
2011; 88: E5-E15.
3. Lascaratos J, Marketos S. A historical outline of Greek ophthalmology from the
Hellenistic period up to the establishment of the first universities. Documenta
Ophthalmologica 1988; 68: 157-69.
4. Thompson HS, Wall M. Imaging and Perimetry Society (IPS). A history of
perimetry. 2010. http://webeye.ophth.uiowa.edu/ips/Perimetry
5. Racette L, Fischer M, Bebie H, Holló G, Johnson CA, Matsumoto C. Visual field
digest. Una guía de perimetría y del perímetro Octopus. 8th ed. Köniz: Haag-
Streit AG; 2019.
6. Heijl A, Patella VM, Bengtsson B. Effective perimetry. 4th ed. Jena: Carl Zeiss
Meditec AG; 2012.
7. Johnson CA. Detecting functional changes in the patient´s vision: Visual field
analysis. In: Samples JR, Schacknow PN (eds). Clinical glaucoma care. 1st ed.
London: Springer; 2014.
8. Nayak BK, Dharwadkar S. Interpretation of autoperimetry. J Clin Ophthalmol
Res 2014; 2: 31-59.
9. Manual de Oftalmología. 5ª Edición. Técnicas Diagnósticas en Oftalmología.
Cap. 2. Técnicas de exploración del segmento anterior.Pag 74-80. J.A. Durán
de la Colina y A. Arntz Bustos.
10. Manual de Oftalmología. 5ª Edición. Técnicas Diagnósticas en Oftalmología.
Cap. 4. Segmento Posterior. B. Corcóstegui, R. Castillo J. Moreno.
11. Lemp, M. A, Holly, F. J. Recent advances in ocular Surface chemistry. Am J
Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1970; 47: 669-672.
12. Apuntes Diploma en atención optométrica del paciente patológico. Módulo 1.
Capítulo 2. Universidad de Valencia.
13. Hansen, M.K., Jensen, P.K. Ultrasonographic, three-dimensional scanning for
determination of intraocular tumor volume. Acta Ophthalmol 1991; 69: 178-
186.
Examen con lámpara de hendidura.
REFERENCIA:
1. Abelson MB, Ousler GW, 3rd, Nally LA, Welch D, Krenzer K. Alternative
reference values for tear film break up time in normal and dry eye populations.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;506:1121-5
2. Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival staining in
the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea. 2003;22:640-50
3. DEWS Diagnostic Methodology Subcommittee, 2007. Methodologies to
diagnose and monitor dry eye disease: report of the Diagnostic Methodology
Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf.
2007;5:108-52
4. Efron N. Grading scales for contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol
Opt. 1998;18:182-6
5. Elliott M, Fandrich H, Simpson T, Fonn D. Analysis of the repeatability of tear
break-up time measurement techniques on asymptomatic subjects before, during
and after contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 1998;21:98-103
6. González-Cavada J. Atlas de lámpara de hendidura y lentes de contacto.
Madrid: Grupo ICM; 2015.
Otras técnicas de Imagen del polo anterior ocular.
REFERENCIAS:
1. Freddo FT, Chaum E. Anatomy of the Eye and Orbit. The clinical essentials. 1ª
ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health, 2018.
2. González-Meijome JM, Villa-Collar C. Superficie Ocular y Lentes de Contacto.
1ª ed. Madrid: ICM, 2016
3. Alió, JL. Keratoconus: Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. 1ª ed.
Cham: Springer-Nature, 2016
4. Gomes JAP, Rapuano CJ, Belin MW, Ambrosio R Jr, Group of Panelists for the
Global Delphi Panel of Keratoconus and Ectatic Diseases. Global Consensus on
Keratoconus Diagnosis. Cornea 2015 Dec;34(12):e38-9.
5. Cavas-Martínez F, De la Cruz Sánchez E, Nieto-Martínez J, Fernández-
Cañavate FJ, Fernández-Pacheco DG. Corneal Topography in Keratoconus:
State of the art. Eye Vis (Lond) 2016 Feb; 22;3:5
6. Fan R, Chan TC, Prakash G, Jhanji V. Applications of corneal topography and
tomography: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar;46(2):133-146.
7. Gupta D. Glaucoma. Diagnosis and Management. 1ª ed. Philadelphia:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2004.
8. Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Rebolleda G, Díaz-Llopis M. Tomografía de Coherencia
Óptica. 1ª ed. Madrid: 2011.
9. Steinert RF, Huang D. Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography. 1ª ed.
Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 2008.
10. Akman A, Bayer A, Nouri-Mandavi K. Optical Coherence tomography in
Glaucoma. 1ª ed. Cham: Springer Nature, 2018
Superficie ocular.
REFERENCIAS
1. Barabino S, Chen Y, Chauhan S, Dana R. Ocular surface immunity: homeostatic
mechanisms and their disruption in dry eye disease. Prog Retin Eye Res.
2012;31(3):271-85.
2. Paulsen F. Functional anatomy and immunological interactions of ocular
surface and adnexa. Dev Ophthalmol. 2008;41:21-35.
3. Herrero-Vanrell R, Peral A. [International Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS). Update
of the disease]. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2007;82(12):733-4.
4. Willcox MDP, Argueso P, Georgiev GA, Holopainen JM, Laurie GW, Millar TJ,
et al. TFOS DEWS II Tear Film Report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15(3):366-403.
5. Arita R, Fukuoka S, Morishige N. New insights into the morphology and
function of meibomian glands. Exp Eye Res. 2017;163:64-71.
6. Nakamori K, Odawara M, Nakajima T, Mizutani T, Tsubota K. Blinking is
controlled primarily by ocular surface conditions. Am J Ophthalmol.
1997;124(1):24-30.
7. Stern ME, Gao J, Siemasko KF, Beuerman RW, Pflugfelder SC. The role of the
lacrimal functional unit in the pathophysiology of dry eye. Exp Eye Res.
2004;78(3):409-16.
8. Ablamowicz AF, Nichols JJ. Ocular Surface Membrane-Associated Mucins.
Ocul Surf. 2016;14(3):331-41.
9. Konat Zorzi G, Contreras-Ruiz L, Parraga JE, Lopez-Garcia A, Romero Bello
R, Diebold Y, et al. Expression of MUC5AC in ocular surface epithelial cells
using cationized gelatin nanoparticles. Mol Pharm. 2011;8(5):1783-8.
10. Zhao H, Jumblatt JE, Wood TO, Jumblatt MM. Quantification of MUC5AC
protein in human tears. Cornea. 2001;20(8):873-7.
Examen del fondo de ojo. Técnicas de exploración del polo posterior
REFERENCIAS:
1. Pastor Jimeno JC y cols. Guiones de oftalmología. Aprendizaje basado en
competencias. 2ª edición. Mc Graw-Hill Interamericana de España; 2012.
2. Pastor Jimeno JC. Guiones de oftalmología. 1ª edición. Mc Graw-Hill
Interamericana de España; 1999.
3. Saine PJ y cols. Ophthalmic photography, angiography and electronic imaging
(2ª ed). Ed Butterworth-Heinemann; 2002
4. Kanski JJ. Oftalmología clínica (8ª ed). Brad Bowlig. Elsevier España. SLU;
2016.
5. Ruiz Moreno JM y cols. Manual de retina SERV, Sociedad Española de Retina y
Vítreo (2ª ed). Elsevier España; 2019.
6. Bennett TJ y cols. Ophthalmic imaging today: an ophthalmic photographer's
viewpoint - a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009; 37: 2-13.
7. Keane PA y cols. Retinal imaging in the twenty-first century and beyond: state
of the art and future directions. Ophthalmology 2014; 121: 2489-500.
8. Jürgens I Diagnóstico por la imagen en retina SERV (Sociedad Española de
Retina y Vítreo),. Ed. Elsevier; 2014.
9. Choudhry N, y cols.. Classification and guidelines for widefield imaging:
Recommendations from the International Widefield Imaging Study Group.
Ophthalmol Retina. 2019; 3: 843-849.
10. Roth DB y cols. Screening for retinopathy of prematurity employing the RetCam
120: sensitivity and specifity. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 268-72.
Tonometría ocular y Biomecánica
REFERENCIAS:
1. Bayraktar S, Bayraktar Z. Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure
relationship in eyes with and without previous LASIK: comparison of Goldmann
applanation tonometer with neumatonometer. Eur J Ophthalmol 2005;15:81-8.
2. Fontes BM, Ambrosio R, Jr., Jardim D, et al. Corneal Biomechanical Metrics
and Anterior Segment Parameters in Mild Keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2010.
3. Garcia Resua C, Yebra-Pimentel E. Tonometria. Técnicas de medida: utilidad
clínica. Xativa: Ulleye; 2007.
4. Garcia-Resua C, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Gilino J, Yebra-Pimentel E. Accuracy
of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy
eyes. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:102-7.
5. Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Ohmoto F. Time course of corneal biomechanical
parameters after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmic Res 2009;42:167-71.
6. Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E, et al. Effect of central corneal thickness,
corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol
2006;124:471-6.
7. Lam AK, Chan R, Lam CH. The validity of a new noncontact tonometer and its
comparison with the Goldmann tonometer. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:601-5.
8. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular
pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg
2005;31:146-55.
9. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Fernandez-Vidal A, et al. Ocular
response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular
pressure measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:4410-4.
10. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Vico E, et al. Effect of corneal
thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
Ophthalmology 2006;113:2156-62.
11. Miki A, Yasukura Y, Weinreb RN, et al. Dynamic Scheimpflug ocular
biomechanical parameters in untreated primary open angle glaucoma eyes.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(4):19.
12. Pillunat KR, Hermann C, Spoerl E, Pillunat LE. Analyzing biomechanical
parameters of the cornea with glaucoma severity in open-angle glaucoma.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (2016) 254:1345–1351.
13. Saad A, Lteif Y, Azan E, Gatinel D. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus
suspect eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(6):2912-2916.
doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4304
14. Tonnu PA, Ho T, Newson T, et al. The influence of central corneal thickness and
age on intraocular pressure measured by neumotonometry, non-contact
tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Br J
Ophthalmol 2005;89:851-4.
15. Vinciguerra R, Ambrósio R Jr, Elsheikh A, et al. Detection of Keratoconus With
a New Biomechanical Index. J Refract Surg. 2016;32(12):803-810.
16. Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers.
Surv Ophthalmol 1993;38:1-30.
Biometría ocular y cálculo de la Lente Intraocular (LIO).
REFERENCIAS
1. Apple D, Sims J. Harold Ridley and the invention of the intraocular lens. Surv
Ophthalmol. 1996; 40: p. 279-292.
2. Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol
Escand. 2007; 85: p. 472-485.
3. Shammas HJ. Intraocular lens power calculation Thorofare, NJ: SLACK
Incorporated; 2004.
4. Viqueira-Pérez V, De Fez D, Martínez-Verdú FM. Óptica fisiológica. Modelo
paraxial y compensación óptica del ojo Alicante Ud, editor. Alicante; 2003.
5. Calvache Anaya JA. Manual de biometría ocular y cálculo de lentes
intraoculares Castellón de la Plana: SAERA; 2017.
6. Gutmark R, Guiton D. Origins of the Keratometer and its Evolving Role in
Ophthalmology. Surv Ophthalmol. 2010; 55: p. 481-497.
Rehabilitación visual y Ortóptica.
REFERENCIAS:
1. Birch EE, Fawcett SL, Morale SE et al. Risk factors for accommodative
esotropia among hypermetropic children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
2005;46:526-9.
2. Shainberg MJ. Nonsurgical treatment of teenagers with high AC/A ratio
esotropia. Am Orthopt J 2014;64:32-6.
3. Mezer E, Wygnanski-Jaffe T, Stolovich C. Progressive-addition lenses for
accommodative esotropia with a high accomodative element. Strabismus
2015;23:170-5.
4. Gonzalez E, Barra F, Sanchez I et al. High AC/A accommodative esotropia
strabismus treated with contact lenses: A single case design (N=1) study.
Binocul Vis Strabismus Q 2007;22:90-5.
5. Birch EE, Stager DR, Berry P et al. Stereopsis and long-term stability of
alignment in esotropia. Journal of American Association for Pediatric
Ophthalmology and Strabismus 2004;8:146-50.
6. Jacobs SM, Green-Simms A, Diehl NN et al. Long-term follow-up of acquired
nonaccommodative esotropia in a population-based cohort. Ophthalmology
2011;118:1170-4.
7. Trigler L, Siatkowski RM. Factors associated with horizontal reoperation in
infantile esotropia. Journal of American Association for Pediatric
Ophthalmology and Strabismus 2002;6:15-20.
8. Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Instability of ocular alignment in
childhood esotropia. Ophthalmology 2008;115:2266,2274. e4.
Rehabilitación visual en Baja Visión
REFERENCIAS
1. Adiestramiento de la visión subnormal INDE , Krister; BÄCKMAN , Örjan;
ZURITA FANJUL , Pedro Alejandro tr.; EIROA , María Victoria tr.; TORRES
GIL , María Teresa adapt.; VICENTE MOSQUETE , María Jesús adapt..
Madrid : Organización Nacional de Ciegos Españoles, Dirección de Acción
Social cop. 1997
2. Apuntes sobre Rehabilitación visual José Miguel Vila López [et. al.]. — Madrid
: Orga-nización Nacional de Ciegos Españoles, Centro de Rehabilitación
Básica y Visual, 1994
3. Clínica de la baja visión FAYE , Eleanor E. dir.; RUBIO DÍEZ , Ana María tr.;
CEBRIÁN DE MIGUEL , María Dolores tr..Madrid : Organización Nacional de
Ciegos Españoles, Dirección de Acción Social cop. 1997
4. Cuidado de la baja visión MEHR , Edwin B.; FREID , Allan N. Madrid :
Organización Nacional de Ciegos Españoles, Sección de Acción Social 1995
5. Discapacidad visual y autonomía personal Enfoque práctico de la
rehabilitación P Ortiz Ortiz O N C E ñ ( )
20
6. E j h E E ñ 2006
7. E f w R h B B w h-H
8. A f w B R h R G C
6
9. O E R T ZURITA AN U A j
IROA BARRA O
N C E ñ C R h (CER O)
88
10. Th A f w B R T
B w h H 7
11. R f B j T G h C
A R E EO 200
12. w R h h h Wh k k
I 2005
13. R f w B R h R G
C 6
14. A ñ f C
G T j C I A h ONCE 2000
15. w A Ch h 2006
16. O f E w H 200
17. B j G B 8
18. Comparing LEA numbers low vision book and Feinbloom visual acuity charts
HadGrave N, Hatley J., Lewerenz D. Optom Vis Sci Nov;89(11):1611-8.
Patología del segmento anterior
REFERENCIAS
1- Kanski JJ, Nischal KK. Atlas de Oftalmología. Signos clínicos y diagnóstico
diferencial. Barcelona 2009. Ed. Elsevier. 6ªed
2- Cullom D, Chang B, et al. Manual de urgencias oftalmológicas. The Wills Eye
Hospital. 2ª edición. México 1998. Ed. McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
3- Spalton D. et al. Atlas of clinical Ophthalmology. 2ª edición. Singapore 1993.
4- Garg A, Rosen E (series eds). Instant clinical diagnosis in Ophthalmology.
Anterior segment diseases. New Delhi 2010. Ed. Jaypee Brothers, MGraw-Hill
5- Maguire JI, Murchison AP, Jaeger E. Wills Eye Institute. 5-minute
ophthalmology consult. Philadelphia 2012. Ed. Lippincot Williams&Wilkins.
Wolters Kluwer Business.
6- Díaz-Llopis M, et al (eds). Uveítis y escleritis. Diagnóstico y tratamiento. XC
Ponencia oficial de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología 2014.
Patología del cristalino y el Cuerpo ciliar.
REFERENCIAS:
1- Kahle W (ed). Atlas de anatomía para estudiantes y médicos. Tomo 3: Sistema
nervioso y órganos de los sentidos. Ediciones Omega. Barcelona 1988
2- Díaz-Llopis M, et al (eds). Uveítis y escleritis. Diagnóstico y tratamiento. XC
Ponencia oficial de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología 2014.
3- Kanski JJ, Nischal KK. Atlas de Oftalmología. Signos clínicos y diagnóstico
diferencial. Barcelona 2009. Ed. Elsevier. 6ªed
4- Cullom D, Chang B, et al. Manual de urgencias oftalmológicas. The Wills Eye
Hospital. 2ª edición. México 1998. Ed. McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
5- Spalton D. et al. Atlas of clinical Ophthalmology. 2ª edición. Singapore 1993.
6- Garg A, Rosen E (series eds). Instant clinical diagnosis in Ophthalmology.
Anterior segment diseases. New Delhi 2010. Ed. Jaypee Brothers, MGraw-Hill
7- Maguire JI, Murchison AP, Jaeger E. Wills Eye Institute. 5-minute
ophthalmology consult. Philadelphia 2012. Ed. Lippincot Williams&Wilkins.
Wolters Kluwer Business.
Glaucoma.
REFERENCIAS:
1. American Academy of Opthalmology. Basic and Clinical Science Course.
Section 10. Glaucoma. 2006-2007.
2. Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M, et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle
glaucoma in Japanese: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology 2004;111:1641-8.
3. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment
Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma.
Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:714-20.
4. Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in
2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:262-7.
5. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections
of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review an meta-analysis.
Ophthalmology 2014;121:2081-90
6. Anton A, Andrada MT, Mujica V, et al. Prevalence of primary open-angle
glaucoma in a Spanish population: the Segovia study. J Glaucoma 2004;13:371-
6.
7. Hara K, Lütjen-Drecoll E, Prestele H. Structural differences between regions of
the ciliary body of primates. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997;16:912.
8. Becker B. The deeline in aqueous secretion and outflow facility with age. Am J
Ophthalmol 1958;46:731.
9. Levene RZ, Workman PL, Broder SW. Heritability of ocular pressure in normal
and suspects ranges. Arch Ophthalmol 1970;84:730.
10. Rudnicka AR, Mt-Isa S, Owen CG, et al. Variations in primary open-angle
glaucoma prevalence by age, gender, and race: a Bayesian meta-analysis.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:4254-61.
11. de Voogd S., Ikram MK, Wolfs RC, et al. Incidence of open-angle glaucoma in a
general elderly population: the Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology
2005;112:1487-93.
12. European Glaucoma Society. Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma. 3rd
edition. Dogma 2009.
13. American Academy of Opthalmology. Primary Angle Closure. Preferred
Practice Pattern (PPP) 2015. https://www.aao.org/preferred-practice-
pattern/primary-angle-closure-ppp-2015 (Fecha de consulta 12/02/2020).
14. American Academy of Opthalmology. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.
Preferred Practice Pattern (PPP) 2015. https://www.aao.org/preferred-
practice-pattern/primary-open-angle-glaucoma-ppp-2015 (Fecha de consulta
12/02/2020).
15. American Academy of Opthalmology. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Suspect.
Preferred Practice Pattern (PPP) 2015. https://www.aao.org/preferred-
practice-pattern/primary-open-angle-glaucoma-suspect-ppp-2015 (Fecha
de consulta 12/02/2020).
Patología del nervio óptico no glaucomatosa.
REFERENCIAS:
1. Arnold AC. Pathogenesis of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. J
Neuro-Ophthalmol 2003;23:157-63.
2. Chan CC, O'Day J. Oral and intravenous steroids in giant cell arteritis. Clin
Experiment Ophthalmol 2003;31:179-82.
3. Hayreh SS, Zimmerman B, Kardon RH. Visual improvement with corticosteroid
therapy in giant cell arteritis. Report of a large study and review of literature.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2002;80:355-67.
4. Beck RW, Trobe JD, et al. High and low risk profiles for the development of
multiple sclerosis within 10 years after optic neuritis: experience of the optic
neuritis treatment trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:944–9.
5. Boomer JA, Siatkowski M. Optic neuritis in adults and children. Semin
Ophthalmol 2003;18:174–80.
6. Costello F, Hodge W, Pan Y I, Eggenberger E, Coupland S, Kardon R H.
Tracking Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Loss After Optic Neuritis: A Prospective
Study Using Optical Coherence Tomography. Mult Scler 2008 Aug;14(7):893-
905.
7. Optic Neuritis Study Group. Visual function 15 years after optic neuritis: A final
follow-up report from the optic neuritis treatment trial. Ophthalmology.
2008;115:1079-82.
8. Randhawa S, Van Stavern GP. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension
(pseudotumor cerebri). Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2008;19:445-53.
9. I E NR N w N W h
H -ophthalmology. 6th ed. Baltimore: Williams&Wilkins;
2005. p. 237-91.
10. Kanski Oftalmología clínica 8ª Edición (2016). Brad Bowling. Editorial
Elsevier. ISBN: 978-84-9113-003-1
11. Ophtharlmology 5th
Edition (2019). Myron YANOFF, Jay S. Duker. Elsevier.
ISBN: 9780323528191
12. Atlas de la retina. 2011. Lawrence A. YANNUZZI. Elsevier
13. American Academy of Ophthalmology, Basic and Clinical Science Course.
Section 5: Neuro-ophthalmology, 2012-2013
14. T G I B
Editorial MRA; 2004.
15. NR N w N W h H -opthalmology.
6th ed. Baltimore: Williams&Wilkins; 2005. p. 385-430.
16. American Academy of Ophthalmology, Basic and Clinical Science Course.
Section 5: Neuro-ophthalmology, 2012-2013
Patología del polo posterior. Criterios de derivación
REFERENCIAS:
1. Wong WL, Su X, Li X, Cheung CMG, Klein R, Cheng C-Y, et al. Global
prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection
for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Heal
2014;2:e106–16.
2. Fritsche LG, Igl W, Bailey JNC, Grassmann F, Sengupta S, Bragg-Gresham JL,
et al. A large genome-wide association study of age-related macular
degeneration highlights contributions of rare and common variants. Nat Genet
2016;48:134–43.
3. Lee R, Wong TY, Sabanayagam C. Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy,
diabetic macular edema and related vision loss. Eye Vis 2015;2:17.
4. Laouri M, Chen E, Looman M, Gallagher M. The burden of disease of retinal
vein occlusion: review of the literature. Eye 2011;25:981–8.
5. Freund KB, Zweifel SA, Engelbert M. Do we need a new classification for
choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration? Retina
2010;30:1333–49.
6. Colijn JM, Buitendijk GHS, Prokofyeva E, Alves D, Cachulo ML, Khawaja AP,
et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in Europe.
Ophthalmology 2017;124:1753–63.
7. Willis JR, Vitale S, Morse L, Parke DW, Rich WL, Lum F, et al. The Prevalence
of myopic choroidal neovascularization in the United States. Ophthalmology
2016;123:1771–82.
8. Lai TYY, Staurenghi G, Lanzetta P, Holz FG, Melissa Liew SH, Desset-Brethes
S, et al. Efficacy and safety of ranibizumab for the treatment of choroidal
neovascularization due to uncommon cause. Retina 2018;38:1464–77.
9. Kitzmann AS, Pulido JS, Diehl NN, Hodge DO, Burke JP. The incidence of
central serous chorioretinopathy in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980-2002.
Ophthalmology 2008;115:169–73.
10. Montero Moreno JA. Enfermedades adquiridas de la mácula. Coriorretinopatía
central serosa. In: Ruiz-Moreno, J M: Arias L, editor. Manual de retina SERV.
2nd Editio. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2019. p. 77–87.
11. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE. The relation of systemic hypertension to changes in
the retinal vasculature: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc
1997;95:329–48.
12. Hayreh SS, Servais GE, Virdi PS. Retinal arteriolar changes in malignant
arterial hypertension. Ophthalmologica 1989;198:178–96.
13. Ç k kçı Ş K ıfçı A ı B N f
hypertensive retinopathy following renal transplantation: a case report.
Transplant Proc 1998;30:788–9.
14. Vila L, Viguera J, Alemán R. Retinopatía diabética y ceguera en España.
Epidemiología y prevención. Endocrinol y Nutr 2008;55:459–75.
15. Schmidt-Erfurth U, Leitgeb RA, Michels S, Povazay B, Sacu S, Hermann B, et
al. Three-dimensional ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography of
macular diseases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:3393–402.
16. Pilli S, Lim P, Zawadzki RJ, Choi SS, Werner JS, Park SS. Fourier-domain
optical coherence tomography of eyes with idiopathic epiretinal membrane:
correlation between macular morphology and visual function. Eye
2011;25:775–83.
Generalidades sobre tumores oculares. Criterios de derivación
REFERENCIAS:
1. Dekmezian MS, Cohen PR, Sami M, Tschen JA. Malignancies of the eyelid: a
review of primary and metastatic cancers. International Journal of Dermatology
2013;52:903-926.
2. Leung C, Johnson D, Pang R, Kratky V. Identifying predictive morphologic
features of malignancy in eyelid lesions. Can Fam Physician 2015;61:e43-9
3. Rene C. Oculoplastic aspects of ocular oncology. Eye 2013; 27:199-207.
4. Murchinson AP, Walrath JD, Washington CV. Non-surgical treatments of
primary, non-melanoma eyelid malignancies: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol
2011;39:65-83
5. Kanski J, Bowling B. Kanski Oftalmología Clínica. Elsevier España SA.
Barcelona. 8ª ed 2016.
Traumatismos oculares y orbitarios y quemaduras.
REFERENCIA
1. Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD. Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology
(BETT): terminology and classification of mechanical eye injuries. Ophthalmol
Clin North Am. 2002; 15(2):139-143.
2. León F, Taboada JF, Guimerá V, et al. Traumatismos oculares graves en
España: Factores epidemiológicos, estudio de las lesiones y medidas de
prevención. Barcelona: León; 1994.
3. Banta JT. Traumatismos oculares. 1ªed. Madrid: Elsevier España, S.A.; 2008.
4. García Arumí J, Fernández-Vega Sanz A. Traumatología ocular. Sociedad
Española de Oftalmología; 2018.
5. Bowling B. Kanski. Oftalmología clínica. Un enfoque sistemático. 8ª ed.
Barcelona: Elsevier España, S.L.U.; 2016.
6. Ehlers JP, Shah CP. Manual de oftalmología del Wills Eye Institute.
Diagnóstico y tratamiento de la enfermedad ocular en la consulta y en
urgencias. 5ªed. Barcelona: Wolters Kluwer Health España, S.A., Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
7. Fulcher TP, McNab AA, Sullivan TJ. Clinical features and management of
intraorbital foreign bodies. Ophthalmology 2002;109(3): 494-500.
8. Wesley RE, Wahl JW, Loden JP, Henderson RR. Management of wooden foreign
bodies in the orbit. South Med J. 1982;75(8):924-926, 932.
Exploración optométrica de las parálisis y paresias de los pares craneales III, IV y
VI.
REFERENCIAS:
1. D. M. Pipe, L.J: Rapley. Ocular Anatomy and Histology. Second Ed. London
UK. Unwin Brothers Ltd. 1999.
2. Adler. j A nica. Moses, R. Buenos Aires. Argentina.
Editorial Médica Panamericana. 1988
3. John V. Forrester, Andrew D. Dick, Paul G. McMenamin and William R.Lee.
The Eye. Basic Sciences in Practice. 2º Ed. New York. USA. Saunders. 1996
4. W Kagle, H Leonhardt, W Platzer. 2003. Atlas de Anatomía, tomo 3, Sistema
nervioso y órganos de los sentidos. Barcelona, España. Editorial Omega
5. Ronald M. Burde, Peter J. Savino, Jonathan D. Trobe. Clinical Decisions in
Neuro-Ophthalmology. St. Louis Missouri USA. Mosby Year Book, Inc. 1992
6. R. John Leigh, David S Zee. The Neurology of Eye Movements 2º Edition.
Philadelphia. USA. F.A. Davis Company. 1991
7. Elizabeth E. Caloroso, Michael W. Rouse. Clinical Management of Strabismus.
Stoneham. MA. USA. Butterworths. 1993
8. Agustín Fonseca Sandomingo, José Abelairas Gómez, José María Rodríguez
Sánchez, Jesús Peralta Calvo. Actualización en Cirugía Oftálmica Pediátrica.
Madrid, España. MAC LINE S.L. .2000
9. John F. Amos. Diagnosis and Management in Vision Care. Stoneham MA. USA.
Butterworths. 1987
10. Gunther K. von Noorden.1990 Binocular Visión and Ocular Motility. 4º.St.
Louis. USA. The C.V. Mosby Company.
Nistagmus
REFERENCIAS:
1. Galán Terraza A. Nistagmus. En: Estado actual del tratamiento del estrabismo.
Galán Terraza A, Visa Nasarre J. LXXXVIII Ponencia Oficial de la Sociedad
Española de Oftalmología 2012. Mc Line, S.L. p. 393-402.
2. Dorado A, Muñoz A, Tejada P. Aproximación diagnóstica en nistagmus en edad
pediátrica. Acta Estrabológica. 2018;2:151-176.
3. Sarvananthan N, Surendran M, Roberts EO, Jain S, Thomas S, Shah N, et al.
The prevalence of nystagmus: the Leicestershire nystagmus survey. Invest
Opthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:5201-6.
4. Kanski J. Oftalmología Clínica. 5ª Edición. p 636-39.
5. Repka MX. Nystagmus: Clinical Evaluation and Surgi- cal Management. In:
Rosenbaum AL, ed. Clinical Stra- bismus Management. Philadelphia: Saunders;
1999: 404-20.
6. Hernández Martínez P, J.M.a Rodríguez del Valle J.M. Nistagmus en la
infancia. Guía de manejo. Acta Estrabológica. 2017;2:113-124.
7. Sarvananthan N, Surendran M, Roberts EO, Jain S, Thomas S, Shah N, et al.
The prevalence of nys- tagmus: the Leicestershire nystagmus survey. Invest
Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(11):5201-6.
8. Abadi RV, Bjerre A. Motor and sensory characteristics of infantile nystagmus.
Br J Opthalmol. 2002;86:1152-60.
9. Sheth NV, Dell`Osso LF, Leigh RJ, Van Doren CL, Peckham HP. The effects of
afferent stimulation on congenital nystagmus foveation periods. Vision Res.
1995;35:2371-82.
10. Perea J. En Estrabismos 2008 cap.14:4-87.
Manifestaciones oculares de enfermedades sistémicas.
REFERENCIAS:
1. Sánchez Salorio M, Díaz-Llopis M, Benítez del Castillo Sánchez JM, Rodríguez
Ares MT. Manifestaciones oftalmológicas de las enfermedades generales.
Sociedad Española de Oftalmología; 2001.
2. Rozman C. Compendio de Medicina interna. 2ª ed. Madrid: ediciones Harcourt,
S.A.; 2002.
3. Martínez Esteban JI, Martínez Baeza A. Enfermedades sistémicas con
afectación ocular. Madrid: Colegio Nacional de Ópticos-Optometristas y J.
Ignacio Martínez Esteban; 1999.
4. Bowling B. Kanski. Oftalmología clínica. Un enfoque sistemático. 8ª ed.
Barcelona: Elsevier España, S.L.U.; 2016.
5. Alperi López M. Manual SER de Enfermedades Reumáticas. 6ª ed. Madrid:
Sociedad Española de Reumatología; 2014.
6. Skuta GL, Cantor LB, Weiss JS. Neuroftalmología. En: Curso de Ciencias
Básicas y Clínicas. American Academy of Ophthalmology. 2011-2012.
Barcelona: Elsevier España, S.L.; 2013.
7. Sunness JS. The pregnant woman´s eye. Surv Ophthalmol 1988; 32: 219-238.
8. Grotting LA, Papaliodis GN. A Review of the Course and Treatment of Non-
Infectious Uveitis during Pregnancy. Semin Ophthalmol. 2017;32(1):75-81. doi:
10.1080/08820538.2016.1228402.
Principios generales de farmacología.
REFERENCIA:
1. Hughes PM, Olejnik O, Chang-Lin JE, Wilson CG. Topical and systemic drug
delivery to the posterior segments. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005 Dec
13;57(14):2010-32
2. Randa Hilal-Dandan, Laurence L.Brunton. Manual de farmacología y
terapéutica, 2e. Goodman & Gilman. www.accessmedicina.com
3. Orts A. Fundamentos de farmacología ocular. Ed.Asociación de Amigos de EU
de OPT 1994. 482p.
4. Ritch R. Complementary therapy for the treatment of glaucoma: a perspective.
Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2005; 18: 597-609.
5. García M, Forster V, Hicks D, Vecino E. Effects of muller glia on cell survival
and neuritogenesis in adult porcine retina in vitro. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
2002; 43: 3735-3743.
6. Mittal S, Cohen A, Maysinger D. In vitro effects of brain derived neurotrophic
factor released from microspheres. Neuroreport 1994; 5: 2577-2582.
7. Brao-Osuna I, Checa P, Herrero-Vanrell R. [New therapeutic systems of
neuroprotectors agents in the treatment of glaucoma]. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol.
2007 Apr;82(4):191-3.
8. Baños JE, March M. Farmacología ocular. Ed. UPC. Barcelona 2012. 218 p.
9. Beneit JV, Velasco A.Farmacología. Ed. Luzán. 1992. 408p.
10. Fraga MD, Domínguez MJ. Protocolo de uso de agentes antiangiogénicos y
corticoides intravítreos en patología ocular. Servicio de Farmacia. Hospital
Gral La Mancha Centro. Alcázar de San Juan (Ciudad Real). 2015.
11. Menezo JL, Onrubia JE, Harto MA. Principios de patología y farmacología
ocular. Ed. J.E:Onrubia Fuertes. Valencia 1993. 453p.
12. Montes-Mico R. Optometría. Aspectos avanzados y consideraciones especiales.
Ed. Elsevier. 2011
Optometría basada en la evidencia.
REFERENCIAS:
1. Murad MH, Montori VM, Ioannidis JPA, Jaeschke R, Devereaux PJ, Prasad K,
Neumann I, Carrasco-Labra A, Agoritsas T, Hatala R, Meade O, Wyer P, Cook
DJ, Guyatt G. How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the
U ’ h rature. JAMA 2014;
312:171-179.
2. Morales Asencio JM, Gonzalo Jiménez E, Martín Santos FJ, Morilla Herrera
JC. Salud pública basada en la evidencia. Recursos sobre la efectividad de
intervenciones en la comunidad. Rev Esp Salud Pública 2008;82:5-20.
3. González-Méijome JM. Science, pseudoscience, evidence-based practice and
post truth. J Optom 2017;10:203-204.
4. Piñero DP. Science-based vision therapy. J Optom 2016;9:203-4.
5. Piñero DP. Uncontrolled experimentation is not an option for open minds:
ethical research is the answer. J Optom 2019;12:69-70.
6. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). SIGN 50: A guideline
developer's handbook. Edinburgo: SIGN; 2014 [octubre], 1-62.
7. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Developing NICE guidelines:
The manual. Process methods guide. NICE; 2014, 245. Disponible
en: http://www.nice.org.uk/article/pmg20.
8. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y,
Glasziou P, DeBeer H, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Meerpohl J, Dahm P, Schünemann
HJ. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary
of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:383-394.
9. AHRQ. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website. Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality. 2003. Disponible en: http://www.ahcpr.gov/.
10. Hernández Aguado I, Lumbreras Lacarra B. Manual de epidemiología y salud
pública para grados en ciencias de la salud (3ª ed.). Madrid: Editorial Medica
Panamericana S.A.; 2018.
11. Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. The science of reviewing research. Ann N Y Acad Sci
1993;703:125-33.
12. Glass GVV. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educ Res
1976;5:3-8.
13. Higgins JP, Green S. Manual Cochrane de revisiones sistemáticas de
intervenciones. Cochrane 2011:1-639.
Salud pública y epidemiología.
REFERENCIAS:
1. Medicina preventiva y salud pública. Piédrola Gil, G. Barcelona: Elsevier
España, 2016.
2. Epidemiología clínica. Fletcher, RH., Fletcher, SW. Barcelona: Wolters Kluwer,
2016.
3. Metodología de la investigación y práctica clínica basada en la evidencia. Soria
Aledo, V. Sánchez Marín, FJ., Molina Durán, F. Murcia: Murcia (Comunidad
Autónoma). Consejería de Sanidad, 2013.
4. Manual de epidemiología y salud pública: para grados de ciencias de la salud.
Hernández-Aguado, I. Madrid: Médica Panamericana, 2011.
5. Método epidemiológico. Pérez Gómez, B. Madrid: Escuela Nacional de Sanidad
(ENS), 2009.
Protección de la salud visual en el medio laboral.
REFERENCIA:
1. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo. https://www.insst.es/
2. Asociación Española de Ergonomía. http://www.ergonomos.es/
3. Comisión Internacional de Iluminación y Color. http://cie.co.at/
4. Comisión Internacional de Protección a Radiación No-Ionizante.
https://www.icnirp.org/
5. North, Rachel V. Trabajo y ojo. Barcelona: Masson; 1996.
6. Ministerio de Trabajo, Migraciones y Seguridad Social.
http://www.mitramiss.gob.es/
ANEXO
Normativa básica en materia de Sanidad.
Real Decreto 1030/2006, de 15 de septiembre, por el que se establece la cartera
de servicios comunes al Sistema Nacional de Salud y el procedimiento de
utilización.
Ley 10/2014, de 29 de diciembre, de la Generalitat, de Salud de la Comunitat
Valenciana.
Ley 44/2003, de 21 de noviembre, de ordenación de las profesiones sanitarias.
Ley 41/2002, de 14 de noviembre, básica reguladora de la autonomía del
paciente y de derechos y obligaciones en materia de información y
documentación clínica.
Ley orgánica 3/2018, de 5 de diciembre, de Protección de Datos personales y
garantía de los derechos digitales. Reglamento UE 2016/679 del Parlamento
Europeo y del Consejo de 27 de abril de 2016 relativo a la protección de las
personas físicas en lo que respecta al tratamiento de datos personales y a la
libre circulación de estos datos.
Referencias:
1 https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2006-16212
2 https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2015-1239
3 https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2003-21340
4 https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2002-22188
5 https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2018-16673
6 https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=DOUE-L-2016-80807
Recommended