Cambio de Acitividad de GC Por Radicales OH

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/4/2019 Cambio de Acitividad de GC Por Radicales OH

    1/4

    Activity changes of glassy carbon electrodes caused by their exposure to OH radicals

    Tomasz Rapecki a, Anna M. Nowicka a, Mikolaj Donten a, Fritz Scholz b, Zbigniew Stojek a,a Department of Chemistry, Warsaw University, ul. Pasteura 1, 02-093 Warsaw, Polandb Institut fr Biochemie, Universitt Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff, Str. 4, 17487 Greifswald, Germany

    a b s t r a c ta r t i c l e i n f o

    Article history:

    Received 11 August 2010

    Received in revised form 17 August 2010

    Accepted 18 August 2010Available online xxxx

    Keywords:

    Glassy carbon

    OH radicals

    Metal nucleation

    Surface erosion

    GC electrodes were exposed to Fenton solutions. The surface changes produced by the OH radicals of these

    solution were inspected using SEM, XPS, Raman spectroscopy and electrochemistry. The OH radicals caused

    erosion and roughening of the surface, selective oxidation and dissolution of sp2 carbon, and reduction of the

    number of nucleation sites for silver deposition.

    2010 Published by Elsevier B.V.

    1. Introduction

    Carbon-based electrodes are nearly ubiquitous in the laboratory

    because of their availability in various forms and shapes, and their

    wide potential window [1,2]. The most common method of activationof glassy carbon (GC) is to polish its surface with micro-sized

    abrasives. After such treatment a fresh new surface should be

    obtained, however, the polishing on some types of pads can

    occasionally deactivate the surface, while the use of too big particles

    of abrasive canlead to relatively large surface scratches [3]. To remove

    remains of polishing material the ultrasonication is often needed. The

    impurities can be also removed by electrochemical oxidative

    procedures [4]. A number of electrode pretreatments to yield an

    active and reproducible electrode surface have been proposed [5].

    Free radicals can cause substantial changes in the morphology and

    activity of the conducting surfaces. As it has already been shown for

    gold, the real surface area of gold electrodes treated with OH radicals

    can diminish (chemical polishing action) and the voltammetric

    response of analytes can change due to changes in the electron

    transfer rate and the reaction path [6,7]. The aim of this paper was to

    characterize how the action of OH radicals can affect the parameters

    (including theamount of bound oxygenand the surface roughness) of

    GC electrodes. The corresponding changes in the chronoamperometric

    electrodeposition of silver are also shown.

    2. Experimental section

    Cyclic voltammetry was performed with an Autolab, model 12

    potentiostat (Eco-Chemie, Utrecht). A GC electrode (3 mm in

    diameter, BASi, USA) was used as the working electrode; saturatedAg/AgCl and calomel electrodes and a platinum wire were used as the

    reference and auxiliary electrodes, respectively.

    Fenton solutions were always freshly prepared from ammonium

    iron(II) sulfate hexahydrate (Merck), EDTA (Merck), 0.01 M acetate

    buffer (pH 4.7) and hydrogen peroxide solution (POCh). Just before

    each measurement the surface of the working electrode was polished,

    immersed in the Fenton solution for a defined time interval and

    washed with purified water. To avoid the change in activity of Fenton

    solutions the longer exposures consisted of appropriate number of 5-

    min treatments in freshly prepared solutions.

    In the nucleation experiments the following supporting electro-

    lytes were used: 2 mM silver nitrate (POCh, Gliwice. Poland) and 0.25

    M potassium nitrate (POCh).

    X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were

    performed with an ESCALAB-210 spectrometer from VG Scientific.

    Raman spectra were collected in the backscattering configuration

    with a Labram HR800 (Horiba Jobin Yvon) confocal microscope

    system equipped with a CCD detector (1024256 pixel), using a

    20 mW HeNe (632.8 nm) laser.

    Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images were taken with an

    Ultra Plus FESEM, Zeiss, Germany, using 1-kV acceleration voltage and

    a low-energy-loss back-scattered electrons detector which provided a

    high contrast.

    K-type GC plates (cti Chemie+Werkstoff Technik GmbH, Idstein,

    Germany) used for the XPS, Raman and SEM measurements were

    produced by pyrolysis of aromatic polymers at circa 1000 C.

    Electrochemistry Communications xxx (2010) xxxxxx

    Corresponding author.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (Z. Stojek).

    ELECOM-03665; No of Pages 4

    1388-2481/$ see front matter 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V.

    doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026

    Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

    Electrochemistry Communications

    j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / e l e c o m

    Please cite this article as: T. Rapecki, et al., Activity changes of glassy carbon electrodes caused by their exposure to OH radicals, Electrochem.Commun. (2010), doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026mailto:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13882481http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13882481http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026mailto:[email protected]://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026
  • 8/4/2019 Cambio de Acitividad de GC Por Radicales OH

    2/4

    3. Result and discussions

    3.1. Surface structure changes

    Fig. 1 depicts a SEM image of the GC surface after mechanical

    polishing and before exposing it to OH. Typical SEM images recorded

    after immersion of the electrode in Fenton's solution for 30 and

    60 min are presented in Fig. 1. A progress in the corrosion of the GC

    surface with time of the OH

    action is clearly visible in themicrographs. After 30 min of the radical treatment the surface is

    still marked with a net of very fine scratches formed during its

    mechanical polishing before the radical treatment; however, the first

    effects of the erosion of the material can be already noticed. The net of

    scratches is almost invisible for the samples treated for 45 min and

    completely vanishes after 60 min. The disappearing of the scratches

    on the GC surface indicates the removal of a layer of carbon from the

    GC surface treated. It can be a combined process of mechanical

    crumbling and chemical oxidation.

    According to the model proposed by Jenkins and Kawamura [8],

    glassy carbon consists of long sheets (microfibrils) of hexagonally

    oriented, sp2-hybridized carbon atoms. However, unlike graphite,

    there is no precise orientation of the carbon atoms from layer to layer

    [9], also, some sp3 carbon atoms can be expected. XPS experiments

    showed that the amount of oxygen at the surface layer increased

    (from 8 to 35%) with time of electrode treatment by OH

    radicals up to45 min. and then surprisingly dropped below 30%. Apparently, OH

    radicals first oxidized the sp2 carbon atoms to alcohol, carbonyl or

    carboxyl groups and finally detached those carbon atoms as CO2. At

    the same time the amount of the sp3 bonds (diamond-like)

    significantly increased (from 11 to 16%) while the percentage of

    carbon sp2 (graphite type) decreased (from 60 to 31%), which is a

    significant change in sp3/sp2 molar ratio.

    The above XPS results are in good agreement with the Raman data.

    In the range 600 1800 cm1 the bare GC exhibits two characteristic

    intense Raman bands at ~1360 cm1 (diamond band) and ~1600 cm1

    (graphite band) [10]. Both the graphite and the diamond bands

    undergo significant changes upon interactions with OH radicals.

    Intensities of both bands increase (up to 30 min), but only the

    graphite-type band changes its position: it shifts towards higher

    frequencies. This shift towards higher energies is characteristic for the

    oxidation state of carbon [11].

    3.2. Electroactivity changes

    We have examined the electrodeposition and nucleation of silver

    on pure GC and GC treated with OH. Typical experimental current

    transients for 0.12 V vs. SCE (overpotential of 0.44 V) obtained with a

    pure GC electrode and the GC electrodes treated with OH are

    presented in Fig. 2A. The first parts of the chronoamperometric curves

    reflect an increase in the current related to the nucleation (increase in

    number of active sites) and growth of silver particles on the surface of

    GC electrode. The current reaches a maximum and then starts to

    decrease due to the overlap of diffusion fields around the nuclei. The

    current maximum of silver deposition decreases and occurs at longertimes as the time of dipping of GC electrode in Fenton solution is

    prolonged. These results suggest that the number of active sites and

    silver nuclei decrease with an extension of time of OH interaction

    with GC substrate.

    A comparison between the experimental curves and the theoret-

    ical data allows determining the nucleation type. According to the

    model of diffusion-controlled growth of hemispherical particles

    proposed by Scharifker and Hills [12], two limiting nucleation

    mechanisms can be considered: the progressive and the so-called

    instantaneous. The progressive nucleation is related to the growth of

    number of nucleation sites activated during the course of the

    electrodeposition process. The so-called instantaneous nucleation

    corresponds to the growth of the nuclei on a smaller number of active

    sites, all activated at the same time during the initial phase of theelectroreduction.

    The theoretical currenttime transients for the two considered

    cases: instantaneous and progressive nucleation can be described by

    the equations:

    i2

    i2m

    !=

    1:9542

    t= tm1exp 1:2564

    t

    tm

    2

    1

    i2

    i2m

    !=

    1:2254

    t= tm1exp 2:3367

    t

    tm

    2

    22

    where i is current density and tis time; im and tm are the coordinates

    of the peak.

    0 min

    30 min

    200 nm

    200 nm

    60 min

    200 nm

    Fig. 1. Micrographs of GC surface obtained after: 0, 30 and 60 min of OH radicals'

    treatment. Concentrations of Fe2+

    , EDTA and H2O2 are 1, 1 and 10 mM, respectively.

    2 T. Rapecki et al. / Electrochemistry Communications xxx (2010) xxxxxx

    Please cite this article as: T. Rapecki, et al., Activity changes of glassy carbon electrodes caused by their exposure to OH radicals, Electrochem.Commun. (2010), doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026
  • 8/4/2019 Cambio de Acitividad de GC Por Radicales OH

    3/4

    The dimensionless plots, (j(t)/jm)2 vs. t/tm, for selected experi-

    mental chronoamperometric curves are presented in Fig. 2B. They are

    matched with the theoretical plots for the cases of pure progressive

    and instantaneous nucleation. In thecase of deposition of silveron the

    surface of pure, untreated GC substrate, the progressive nucleation of

    silver was dominating. After the treatment with radicals the situation

    changed and the instantaneous mechanism of silver nucleation on the

    glassy carbon surface was observed. These results indicate that the

    treatment of GC surface with OH radicals affects the nucleation

    processes on this substrate in such a way that the number of active

    sites on the surface of GC electrode, at the selected overpotential of

    deposition, decrease.

    The decrease of nuclei population density with the extension of

    time of the treatment of GC electrode with OH radicals was also

    examined by determination (after recording appropriate chronoam-

    perograms) of thenumber of nucleifrom the in-situ SEMphotographs

    of the surface of GC substrate (area examined: 0.007 cm2). The results

    are presented in Fig. 2C and compared with the theoretical number of

    nuclei calculated according to the reference [12] for both limitingcases of the nucleation mechanism. The nuclei population density, N0,

    of instantaneous nucleation mechanism was calculated using the

    equation:

    N0 = 0 :06521

    8C0Vmol 0:5

    zFC0 2

    i2mt2m

    3

    where n is number of electron involved, Fis the Faraday constant, Vmolis the molar volume and C0 is the concentration of species in solution.

    For the progressive nucleation mechanism the density of nuclei at

    saturation, Ns, is given by

    Ns =AN

    2K0

    D 0:5

    4

    AN is the growth rate of the nuclei:

    AN

    =4:6733

    t2mK0

    D5

    and K is defined as

    K0

    =4

    3

    8C0M

    0:56

    where D is the diffusion coefficient of the metal ion, M is the atomic

    mass and is the density of the silver deposit.

    A comparison of the experimental results (obtained from the SEM

    images) and the theoretical data obtained for the two consideredmodels proves that the results obtained for the untreated GC surface

    are closer to the progressive model while those obtained for the

    etched surface fits better the instantaneous model. An increase in

    the exposition time of GC to OH radicals leads also to a decrease in

    the nucleation rate. Most importantly, the results indicate that the

    number of nucleation sites is decreasing as the OH attack lasts. This

    is very surprising as the OH attack is obviously accompanied by a

    surface roughening (see Fig. 1).

    4. Conclusions

    The attack of OH on glassy carbon material leads to a surface

    erosion through selective oxidation of the sp2 carbon atoms. In

    consequence a surface roughening and decrease of number of activenucleation sites for metal deposition occurs. The latter clearly

    demonstrates that surface roughness and the number of active

    nucleation sites are inversely-proportional related. This is challenging

    more detailed studies on the true nature of active sites. Thesp2 carbon

    atoms are regarded as more active sites compared to sp3 [13,14]. The

    electrodeposition of silver is transformed from a progressive to an

    instantaneous nucleation during the OH treatment. The change in

    percentage of sp2 carbon and the possibility of its oxidation and

    selective removal stands behind the change in activity of GC surface.

    Acknowledgement

    The support for this work by the Polish Ministry of Science and

    Higher Education Grant N N204 244534 is gratefully acknowledged.

    t / s

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30

    i/m

    Acm-2

    -0.4

    -0.3

    -0.2

    -0.1

    0.0

    a

    b

    cd

    e

    t/tm

    0 1 2 3 4

    (i/im

    )2

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    0 min15 min30 min

    Instantaneous

    Progressive

    t / min

    0 15 30 45 60

    N*106/cm-2

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5 SEMinst.

    prog.

    A

    B

    C

    Fig. 2. A: Current transients for electrocrystallization of silver at GC electrode obtained

    after: (a) 0, (b) 15, (c) 30, (d) 45, and (e) 60 min of OH radicals treatment.Overpotential: 0.44 V. B: Non-dimensional (i/im)2 vs. (t/tm) plots of current transients

    of silver electrodeposition process. C: Changes of nuclei population density vs. time of

    interactions of GC with OH radicals. Data determined from SEM experiments and

    theoretical calculations for progressive and instantaneous mechanisms.

    3T. Rapecki et al. / Electrochemistry Communications xxx (2010) xxxxxx

    Please cite this article as: T. Rapecki, et al., Activity changes of glassy carbon electrodes caused by their exposure to OH radicals, Electrochem.Commun. (2010), doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026
  • 8/4/2019 Cambio de Acitividad de GC Por Radicales OH

    4/4

    References

    [1] J. Wang, Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2nd ed.Wiley, New York, 2000.[2] M.A.T. Gilmartin, J.P. Hart, Analyst 120 (1995) 1029.[3] D.H. Weisshaar, T. Kuwana, Anal. Chem. 57 (1985) 378.[4] G.K. Kiema, M. Aktay, M.T. McDermott, J. Electroanal. Chem. 540 (2003) 7.[5] P. Chen, R.L. McCreery, Anal. Chem. 68 (1996) 3958.[6] A.M. Nowicka, U. Hasse, M. Hermes, F. Scholz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49 (2010)

    1061.[7] A.M. Nowicka, U. Hasse, G. Sievers, M. Donten, Z. Stojek, S. Fletcher, F. Scholz,

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49 (2010) 3006.

    [8] G.M. Jenkins, K. Kawamura, Polymeric Carbons: Carbon Fibre, Glass and Char,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976.

    [9] J.H. Knox, P. Ross, Adv. Chromatogr. 37 (1997) 73.[10] K. Ray III, R.L. McCreery, Anal. Chem. 69 (1997) 4680.[11] K.N. Kudin, B. Ozbas, H.C. Schniepp, R.K. Prud'homme, I.A. Aksay, R.Car, NanoLett.

    8 (2008) 36.[12] B.R. Scharifker, G. Hills, Electrochim. Acta 28 (1983) 879.[13] O. Niwa, J. Jia, Y. Sato, D. Kato, R. Kurita, K. Maruyama, K. Suzuki, S. Hirono, J. Am.

    Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) 7144.[14] J.A. Bennett, J. Wang, Y. Show, G.M. Sawin, J. Electrochem. Soc. 151 (2004) E306.

    4 T. Rapecki et al. / Electrochemistry Communications xxx (2010) xxxxxx

    Please cite this article as: T. Rapecki, et al., Activity changes of glassy carbon electrodes caused by their exposure to OH radicals, Electrochem.Commun. (2010), doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2010.08.026