Upload
walter-wellington
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Creación de una base de datos de precipitación y temperatura a escala
diaria enel noreste de la Península Ibérica:
Aplicación en estudios de tendencias y extremos climáticos
Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología y Estación Experimental de Aula Dei, Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología y Estación Experimental de Aula Dei, CSIC,CSIC,Campus de Aula Dei, P.O. Box 202, Zaragoza 50080, Spain; Campus de Aula Dei, P.O. Box 202, Zaragoza 50080, Spain; e-mail: [email protected]: [email protected]
Vicente-Serrano SM, El Kenawy AM, Beguería S, López-Moreno JI, Angulo MVicente-Serrano SM, El Kenawy AM, Beguería S, López-Moreno JI, Angulo M
#
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
##
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
###########
####
######
######
#######
########
######
#
## ###
####
####
######
###
####
#
####
# ###
#####
#######
####
##
####
######
###
########
#
#####
######
#
# ######
###
######
##
## #
###
##
# ###
#
#
######
##
##
#### #############
##
##
##
##########
########
###
###
##
#####
#
###
#####
#######
# #############
#####
##########
#####
####
####
##
##
###########
#
######
##
### ##
#######
#
######
#####
##
######
#
## #
##
###
####
##
###
#
#
#
#
###
#
##
##
### ##
##
#
##
#### #
#####
#
#
#
## ##
#
##
####
###
###
#
#
######
## #
##
##
#
#
#
##
# #
####
###
#####
########## #####
##### ###
##
## ## ####
###
######
######
# ##
#####
##
#
####
# #
#
#####
#
#
#####
#### ##
####
##
#
###
#
#
###
#
######
#
###
#
####
###### #
#####
#
##
##
##
#
###
###
###
#
###
#
#
####
#
##
#
##
#
######
#
#
######
##
##
##
#
#
### #
#
##
###
##
#
#
#
##
### #
# ######
##
##### #
####
#
#
#
#
#
#
##
## #
##
## #
#
####
##
##
#
#
#
##
###
#
####
#
##
#
##
#
##
###
#
#
##
##
#
###
#
#
##
####
#
##
##
##
# #
####
#
#
#
##
###
#########
##
####
###
# ###
# ### ##
##
##
####
###
#####
####
#
# ##
#
####
####
###
####### #
####
###
##
###
##
# ###
######
#############
#### ##
########
#
###
############
##
#
#
##
####
###
### ####
####
##
#
###
# ##
##
#
##
#
###
#
#
###
##
#####
####
####
#########
# ##
#####
####
##
#### #
#
##
####
### #
##
# ### #
#
#
#
##
##
##
##### ####
###
###
######
######
##
#
## ##
######
##
###
##
# ####### ##
######
#
### ###
#
####
###
####
#######
##
## ##
###
#
#### ## ######
#
#######
#
#######
########
##########
####
#############
#
#
###
##
###
##
##
##
#
#######
#
####
##
#
#
#
####
# ####### #####
###
#
#####
###
# ###
####
#
###
###
#
##
##
#
#
##
###
###
### ##
###
#
##
#
######
###
#
# #
###
##
##
### ##
#
#
####
###########
##
##
##
##
####
#
#
#
###
#
#
##
###
#
###
####
###
##
##
#
# ##
#####
###
#
#####
#
##
##
###
###
######
###
#
#### #
####
### ####
#
#
#
##
# #
######
###
##
#
##
##
##
#####
###
#
##### #
### #####
##
#######
#### ##########
####
##
##
## #
#####
#
#######
###
#
##
######
####
#
##
# ### ##
#
##
#
#
##
#
##
########
#
#
###
##
# # ####
##
##
# #
######
###
###
##
##
#### #
# ######
# ####
####
##
###
#####
########
####
###
###
#### #
#####
#
#### ###
#####
##
###
#
#
## ## #
#### ######
###
###
## ####
##
# #
##
####
##
### ###
#######
#
#####
###########
##### #####
##########
###
##
######
#######
#######
####
#####
#
#
##
#####
#
###
###
##
##########
#
####
##
###
####
##
#######
###
## ###
#
###
###
##
# ####
###
#
##
#####
#
####
##
###
##
####### #
###
##
#
##
##
#### ##
#
#
######
##
###
#
######
#
### #
####
#
###
## ## #
##
###
#########
#########
#
#
##
####
####
##
#
#
## ##
#####
###
#
###
################ ####
#
#
###
##
###
####
##
#
##
#
#
## ##
## ##### #
#
###
## ###
#
##
#
####
#
#
#
#
#### #
###
######
####
###
#####
#
##
#
#
# #
#
#
#
##
#######
########
#
###### #
##
####
########
############
#
########
####
###
#
#####
##
####
###
########################
#######
#
########
####
###
####
# ###
######
## #
##
##
######
##
########## #
##
#
###
###
##
###
######
## ######
####
##
###
#
####
##
# ###
# ### #### ###
#
###
##
#
##
###
#######
####
##
#####
#####
##
#
####
##
##
#######
#######
###
#
#
####
#####
#
#####
# #####
######
###
############
####
#
######
###
##
##########
####
####
##
#######
#
###
###
########
###
###
#########
####
###
##
###
####
##
######
#####
#
#
###
######## #
#
###
#
###
######
#
##
####
##################
#########
######
########
#
###
#
########
###
#
##
#######
#### #
#
#########
###
##
#
#####
###
##
####### #
######
########## #
## ##
###
########
### ###
######
###
####
##
####
##
## ##
#####
#
###
#
##
##
####
##
#
####
##
##
#####
######### #######
#
#
#
##
## #### ##
#
######
#
#
##
100 0 100 200 Kilometers
N
The need of detailed spatial studies:
Climatic hazardsClimate variabilityTrends
The need of high temporal resolution:
Extreme precipitationDry spellsHeat waves...
Few studies at a daily time-scale and few homogenised data-sets
Commonly the series are fragmentary, with numerous data gaps
#
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
##
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
###############
######
######
## #####
########
######
#
## ###
####
####
######
###
####
#
####
# ###
#####
#####
##
####
##
####
######
###
########
#
###########
#
######
#
###
######
##
## #
###
##
# ###
#
#
######
##
##
####
##############
#
##
##
###########
##########
###
##
#####
#
###
#####
#######
# #############
#####
##########
#####
####
######
##
########
###
#
######
##
### ##
##### ## #
###
#####
###
##
######
#
## #
##
###
####
##
###
#
#
#
####
#
##
##
### ##
##
#
##
##
## #
#####
#
#
#
## ##
#
##
####
##
#
###
#
#
######
## ###
##
#
#
#
##
# #
####
###
#####
###############
##### ### ##
## ## ####
###
######
####### ##
#####
###
####
##
#
#####
#
#
#####
##
####
####
##
#
###
#
#
###
#
######
#
###
#
####
###### #
#####
#
##
##
##
#
###
###
###
#
###
#
#
####
#
##
###
#
######
##
######
##
##
##
#
#
####
#
##
###
##
#
#
#
##
### #
# ######
#####
## #####
#
#
#
#
#
#
##
##
#
##
## #
#
####
##
##
#
#
#
##
###
#
####
#
##
#
##
#
##
##
##
#
##
##
#
###
#
#
##
####
#
##
##
##
# #
####
#
#
#
##
###
#########
##
####
###
####
# ### ##
##
##
####
###
#####
####
#
# ##
#
####
####
###
####### #
####
###
##
###
##
# ###
######
#############
#### ##
########
#
###
########
####
##
#
#
##
####
###
### ####
#
###
##
#
###
# ##
##
#
##
#
###
#
#
##
#
##
#####
####
####
######
#### #
######
####
##
#### #
#
##
####
### #
##
# ### #
#
#
#
####
######
# ## #####
###
######
######
##
#
## ##
######
##
#####
# ####### ##
##
####
#
### ####
####
###
####
#######
##
## ##
###
#
#### ## ######
#
#######
#
#######
########
## ########
####
#############
##
###
##
###
##
##
###
#### ###
#####
##
#
##
#####
############
###
#
#####
###
# ###
##
##
#
###
###
#
##
##
#
#
##
###
###
### ##
####
##
#
######
##
#
#
# #
###
##
##
### ##
#
#
####
###########
##
##
##
##
##
###
#
#
###
#
#
##
###
#
###
####
###
##
##
#
# ##
#####
###
#
#####
#
##
##
###
###
######
###
#
###
# #
####
### ####
#
#
#
##
# #
######
###
##
#
######
#####
## #
#
##### #
###
#######
######
#
#### ######## ##
####
##
##
## #
#####
#
#######
###
#
##
######
####
##
## #
## ##
#
##
#
#
##
#
##
########
#
#
###
##
# # ####
##
##
# #
######
###
#####
##
#### #
# ####### ##
######
##
###
#############
####
###
###
#### #
######
#### ###
#####
##
###
##
## ## #
#### ####### #####
##
####
##
# #
##
####
##
### ###
####
####
#####
###### #####
##### #####
#######
###
###
##
###
######
###########
####
#####
#
###
#####
#
####
##
##
###
#######
#
####
##
###
####
##
##
########
## ###
##
##
###
##
# ###
####
#
##
#####
#
####
##
###
##
####### #
###
##
#
##
##
#### ##
#
#
######
##
###
#
######
#
### #
####
#
###
#### #
##
###
##################
#
#
##
####
####
##
#
#
## ##
#####
###
#
###
################ ####
#
#
###
##
###
####
##
#
##
#
#
## ##
## ####
# # #
###
## ###
#
##
#
####
#
#
#
#
###
# #
###
######
####
###
#####
#
##
#
#
# #
#
#
#
##
###############
#
######
###
####
########
############
#
########
####
###
#
#####
##
####
############
######################
#
###############
####
# ###
######
## #
##
##
######
##
########## #
##
#
###
###
##
###
## ####
## ######
###
###
###
#
####
##
# ###
# ### #### ###
#
###
##
#
##
###
#######
####
##
#####
#####
##
#
####
##
##############
###
#
#
####
####
##
#####
# #####
#
#######
#
############
####
#
######
###
##
##########
####
####
##
#####
##
#
###
###
########
###
###
#########
####
###
#
#
###
####
##
######
####
#
#
#
##########
# ##
###
#
###
######
###
##
##
##################
#########
##############
#
###
#
########
####
#
####### #
#### #
#
#########
###
##
#
#####
###
##
####### #
####
##
####### ### #
####
###
###
######## #
##
######
###
####
##
####
##
## ##
#####
#
###
#
##
##
####
###
####
##
##
####
#
########
# #######
#
#
#
##
## #### ##
#
######
#
#
##
######
#####
######
# #####
###
###
#
## ####
##
##
#
####
##
####
#
####
#####
####
## ####
##
##
#####
#
##
##
### #
##
##
####
###
## ###
##
####
##
##
##
#
#
#
##
##
##
###
##
#
##
#
##
########## ######
#
###
#
#
##
#
##
#
#
####
######
#####
#####
#
#
#
#
#
##
######
####
### ##
#
##
##
###
###
#
##
##
###
#
#
#
##
##
##
#
###
###
##
#
#
#
#####
#
#### ## #
###
#
#
#
############# #
####
## ##
###
# ## #
#
##
##
###
#
#
#
###
#######
## ###
######
#
#
##
#
##
####
# #
##
#
#####
###
######
###
# #
##
##
#
#
#
#######
####
##
##
##
#
#
##
##
#### #
##
## #
#
# # #
########
##
####
#
#
#
###
###
###
# ##
##
#
#
#
##
#
###
#
###
###
##
###
## #
##
##
##
#
# ###
###
#
# ##
#
#
#
#
###
#
## #
###
#
####
##
#
##
##### #
##
##
##
## #
##### ####
#
##
##
######### #
#######
##
####
###
##
####
##
###
#
#### ####
## ##
###
#
#
##
##
#
#
#
#
###### ###
#
#
#########
#
#
####
#
#
#
##
##
#
##
###
####
#
#
## ## # ##
######
######
#####
#
#
#######
##
##
###
#
##
#
##
#
###
#########
### #
#########
##
####
############
#######
#########
#
###
###### #
#
##
#####
#### #
## #
###
## ##
## # #
# # ###
####### ##
##
#
####
####
##
##
#
##########
#
#
##
######
#
##
#####
#####
####
######
## #####
###########
#
##
##
##### ######
##
#
##########
#
###
####
####
##
###
######
#
## #
#
#
50 0 50 100 Kilometers
N
# Original observatories# Reconstructed observatories
Selection of observatories according the lenght of the series and the number of gaps.
Manual reconstruction of the series according to the distance between observatories (radius < 15 km.)
Among four tested methods for reconstruction, the nearest neighbour method provides better results in terms of magnitude and frequency distributions.
934 were reconstructed from a total of 3106. The rest were used for reconstruction.
Quality control was based on the compariosn of each daily data to the data of neighbour observatories.
On average, the proportion of data substituted was 0.1%
Temporal homogeneity of each reconstructed series was checked
Winter
Pre
cipi
tatio
n (m
m.)
0
100
200
300
400
Candidate seriesReference series
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
T-v
alue
0
10
20
30
Spring
Pre
cipi
tatio
n (m
m.)
0
100
200
300
400
500
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
T-v
alue
0
10
20
30
Summer
Pre
cipi
tatio
n (m
m.)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
T-v
alue
0
10
20
30
Autumn
Pre
cipi
tatio
n (m
m.)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010T
-val
ue0
10
20
30
Annual
Pre
cipi
tatio
n (m
m.)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
T-v
alue
0
10
20
30
40
Seasonal and annual series of monthly precipitation amounts at the El Burgo de Osma (La Rasa) observatory. The series of
T-values and the limit of confidence (dotted line) are also shown.
Annual series of precipitation amounts and number of rainy days at the l’Ametlla de Mar observatory. The series of T-values and the limit of confidence (dotted line) are also
shown.
HOMOGENEITY TESTING PROCEDURE NUMBER OF INHOMOGENEITIES
SERIES ELIMINATED
Precipitation amount 260 74 Number of days with precipitation > 1 mm. 157 32 Monthly maxima and number of days with precipitation above 99.5 percentile
25 0
RECONSTRUCTED PERIOD TOTAL INHOMOGENEOUS % TOTAL % INHOMOGENEOUS > 20 years 383 192 41.0% 43.4% > 5 years < 20 years 229 113 24.5% 25.5% < 5 years 322 137 34.5% 30.1% Total 934 442 100.0% 100.0%
% o
f se
ries
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
% o
f se
ries
0
1
2
3
4
% o
f se
ries
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
% o
f se
ries
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
1
2
3
4
Results from homogeneity process
Percentage of inhomogeneous series with respect to the number of series available for each year: 1) precipitation amount, 2) number of rainy days, 3) monthly maximum and number of days above the 99.5th percentile, 4) total.
#
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
##
##
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
######
#########
######
######
## #####
########
######
#
## ###
####
####
######
###
###
#
#
####
# ###
#####
#######
####
##
####
######
###
########
#
###
########
#
######
#
###
######
##
## #
###
##
# ###
#
#
######
##
##
####
##############
#
##
##
###########
##########
###
##
#####
#
###
#####
#######
# #############
#####
##########
#####
####
######
##
########
###
#
######
##
#####
##### ##
#
###
#####
###
##
######
#
## #
##
###
####
##
###
#
#
#
####
#
##
##
### ##
##
#
##
##
## #
#
####
#
#
#
## ##
#
##
####
##
#
###
#
#
######
## ###
##
#
#
#
##
##
####
###
#####
###############
##### ### ##
## ## ####
###
######
######
# ##
#####
###
####
# #
#
#####
#
#
#####
###
###
####
##
#
###
#
#
###
#
#######
###
#
####
###### #
#####
#
##
##
##
#
###
###
###
#
###
#
#
####
#
##
###
#
######
#
#
######
##
##
##
#
#
####
#
##
###
##
#
#
#
##
### #
# ########
##### ######
#
#
#
#
#
##
###
##
## #
#
####
##
##
#
#
#
##
###
#
####
#
##
#
##
#
#
####
#
#
##
##
#
###
#
#
##
####
#
##
##
##
# #####
#
#
#
##
###
#########
##
####
###
####
# ### ##
##
##
####
###
## ##
#
####
#
###
#
####
####
###
####### #
####
###
##
##
#
##
# ###
######
#############
#### ##########
#
###
############
##
#
#
##
####
###
### ####
#
###
##
#
###
# ##
##
#
##
#
###
#
###
#
##
#####
####
####
######
#### #
######
####
##
###
# #
#
##
####
### #
### ### #
#
#
#
####
######
# #######
###
######
######
##
#
## ##
######
##
#####
# ####### ##
##
## ##
#
### ###
#
####
###
####
#######
##
## ##
###
#
#### ## ######
#
########
#######
########
## ########
####
#############
####
#
##
###
##
##
###
#######
#####
##
#
##
##### #
###########
###
#
#####
###
# ###
####
#
###
###
#
##
##
#
#
##
###
###
#####
####
##
#
######
###
#
# #
###
##
##
### ##
#
#
####
####
#######
##
##
##
##
##
###
#
#
###
#
#
##
###
#
###
####
###
##
##
#
# ##
#####
###
#
#####
#
##
##
###
###
######
###
#
###
# #
####
### ####
#
#
#
##
# #
######
###
##
#
####
##
#####
###
#
##### #
###
#######
#### ##
#
#### # #########
######
##
## #
#####
#
##### ##
###
#
##
######
####
##
## #
## ##
#
##
#
#
##
#
##
########
#
#
###
### # #
###
##
##
# #
######
###
#####
##
###
# ## ####
### ##
######
##
###
####
#########
####
###
###
#### #
#####
#
#### ###
####
###
###
##
## ## #
#### ######
###
###
##
####
##
##
##
####
##
### ###
####
####
#####
###### #####
##### #### #####
######
###
##
####
#####
###########
####
#####
#
#
##
######
####
##
##
#
#########
#
####
##
###
####
##
##
########
## ###
##
##
###
##
# ####
###
#
##
#####
#
####
##
###
##
####### #
###
##
#
##
##
######
#
#
######
##
###
#######
#
### #
####
#
###
## ## #
##
##
####
######
#########
#
#
##
########
##
#
#
## ##
#####
###
#
###
################ ####
#
#
####
#
###
####
##
#
##
#
#
####
## ####
# ##
###
## ###
#
##
#
####
#
#
#
#
###
# #
###
######
####
###
#####
#
##
#
#
# #
#
#
#
##
###
############
#
######
###
####
########
############
#
########
####
###
#
#####
##
####
############
######################
#
###############
####
# ###
#####
### #
##
##
######
##
########## #
##
#
######
##
###
## ####
## ######
###
###
###
#
####
##
# ###
# ### #### ###
##
##
##
#
##
###
#######
####
##
#####
## ###
##
#
####
##
#######
#######
###
#
#
###
##
#####
#####
# #####
######
###
################
#
######
###
##
##########
########
##
#####
##
#
###
###
########
###
###
#########
####
###
##
###
####
##
######
####
#
#
#
##########
# ##
###
#
##
#
######
###
##
##
#####################
######
######
########
####
#
########
###
#
##
#######
#### #
#
#########
###
##
#
#####
###
######### #
######
########## #
## ##
## #
###
######## ###
######
###
####
##
####
##
## ##
#
####
#
###
#
##
##
####
##
#
######
##
#####
########
# #######
#
#
#
##
## #### ###
######
#
#
##
######
#####
######
# ### ##
###
###
#
## ####
##
###
###
###
####
#
####
######
###
## ####
##
##
#####
#
##
##
### #
##
##
####
###
## ###
##
####
##
##
##
#
#
#
##
##
##
###
##
#
##
#
##
########## ######
#
###
#
#
##
#
##
#
#
####
######
#####
#####
#
#
#
#
#
##
######
####
##
# ##
#
##
##
###
###
#
##
####
#
#
#
#
##
##
##
#
######
# #
#
#
#
#####
#
#### ## #
###
#
#
#
############# #
###### ##
###
# ##
##
##
##
###
#
#
#
###
#######
## ###
######
#
#
##
#
##
####
# #
##
#
#####
###
######
###
# ###
##
#
#
#
#######
####
##
##
##
#
#
##
##
## ## ###
###
#
# # #
##########
####
#
#
#
###
###
###
# ##
##
#
#
#
##
#
###
#
###
###
##
##
##
# ###
##
##
#
# ###
###
#
# ##
#
#
#
#
###
#
## #
###
#
####
##
#
##
#####
#
##
##
##
###
##### ####
#
##
##
##########
#########
####
###
######
##
###
#
#### ####
## ##
###
#
#
##
##
#
#
#
#
###### #
##
#
#
#########
#
#
####
#
#
#
##
##
#
#
#
###
#
####
#
## ## # ##
######
######
#####
#
#
#######
##
##
###
#
##
#
##
#
###
#########
### #
#########
##
####
###
#########
#######
#########
#
###
###### #
#
#
#
#####
#### #
## #
###
## ##
## # #
# # ###
####
### ##
##
#
####
####
##
##
#
##########
#
#
##
######
#
##
#####
#####
####
######
## #####
###########
#
##
##
##### ######
##
#
#######
###
#
###
####
####
##
###
######
#
## #
#
#
%
%
%%%
%
%%
%%
%%
%
%% %
%%%
%%
%%%
%%%%% %%%
%
%
%
% %
%%%
%%
%%%%%
%
%
%%
%
%% %%
%
%
%%%%
%
%
%
%%%%%
%
%
%%%% %
%
%
%% %
%%%
%
%
%
%
%%
%%%
%
%
%%
%%
%
%
%%%%
%
%%
%
%%% %
%
%%
%
%%%
%
%%
%
%
%
%
%%
%
%%
%
%%
%
%%
%%
%%
%
%
%%
%%
%
%
%%%%%
%%%
%%%
%%
%%%%
%
%
%%%
%
%
%
%
%%% %
%
%
%%%%
%%
%%
%
%
%%
%
%
% %%%
%%%
%
%
%%%%% %
%
% %%
%
%%%%%%
%
%
%%
%%%%
%%%%%%%
%%%%
%%%% %
%%%%
%
%
%%%%% %
%
%%
%
% %%
%
%
%%
%%%
%
%%%%%
%
%%%%
%%%
%
%% %%%%%%%%%%
%%
%% %
%%
%
%%%%%%
%%%%%%%
%
%%%%%
%%
50 0 50 100 Kilometers
N
# Original# Reconstructed% Homogeneous 1900 1905 1910 1915 1920 1925 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Nu
mb
er
of
ob
se
rva
tori
es
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Reconstructed
Homogenization (precipitation amount)
Homogenization (number of days of precipitation)
Final series:Homogenization (monthly maximum anddays above 99.5 pcnt.)
#
##
##
###
##
##
#
## #
###
##
###
##### ###
##
#
# #
###
#######
#
#
##
#
## ###
#
### #
#
#
#
#####
#
#
#### # ##
## #
###
#
#
#
###
###
#
#
#####
#####
###
#
### #
#
##
####
#
##
#
###
#####
#
##
#
##
##
##
##
####
#
#
########
#######
###
#
###
#
#
#
#
### ##
#
####
####
#
#
##
#
#
# ###
#####
##### ##
# ###
########
##
#######
########
#### #####
##
##### #
#
###
# ###
#
##
###
#
#####
#
####
####
############
##
## ##########
## #####
#
#####
##
#
##
###
##
##
####
### ##
###
####
#
##
#
#
##
#
#
##
##
##
#
#
#
#
####
##
#
##
####
#
###
##
#
##
## #
##
####
#
#
####
## ###
###
##
##
#
#
###
#
#
#
# ###
###
#
##### ##
# #
#######
##
##########
######
#
### # ##
##
##
#
##
###
#
####
#
#
##
## ####
##
## #### #
##
##
#
##
#
##
####
#
#
##
#
#
#
#
#
##
##
#
##
##
#
#
#
# #
##
#
#
#
###
#
###
### #
#
#
##### #
#
########
# ####
## #
#
#
#
#
##
#
#
#
##
## ##
##
# ##
#
#
##
#
#
### #
#### ## #
#
###
#
#
#
##
# ##
##
a) 1920 b) 1935
d) 1965c) 1950
N
50 0 50 100 150 Kilometers
Results
Average amount (mm.) each precipitation day
0 50 100 150 200
Se
miv
ari
an
ce
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
ReconstructedQuality controlHomogeneous
Average duration of dry spells
0 50 100 150 2000
1
2
3
4
5
Average duration of wet spells
0 50 100 150 200
Se
miv
ari
an
ce
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20Number of days with precipitation > 0
Distance (km.)
0 50 100 150 2000.0
2.0e+5
4.0e+5
6.0e+5
8.0e+5
1.0e+6
1.2e+6
Days with precipitation > 75 mm.
Distance (km.)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Se
miv
ari
an
ce
0
50
100
150
200
ReconstructedQuality controlHomogeneous
Distance
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Ave
rage
R-P
ears
on
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Final series
Reconstructed series
Higer spatial coherence of the final dataset
Annual and seasonal mapping of peak intensity, magnitude and duration of extreme precipitation events across a climatic gradient, North-East Spain
459 complete daily precipitation series with continuous data between 1970 and 2002
A declustering process was applied to the original daily series to obtain series of rainfall events. A rainfall event was defined as a series of consecutive days with
registered rainfall, so a period of one or more days without precipitation was the criteria to separate
between events.
Three parameters were determined for each precipitation event: its maximum intensity (in mm per day), total magnitude (accumulated precipitation, in
mm), and duration (in days).
Each event was assigned to the last date of the cluster, which allowed for constructing time series of
precipitation events.
L-moment plots: comparison between theoretical (lines) and empirical (dots) L-skewness (x acis) and L-kurtosis (y axis).
Several theoretical distributions are shown: Generalized Pareto (continuous line), Exponential (intersection between the vertical and horizontal lines), Lognormal (dashed line) and Pearson III
(dotted line).
The methodology adopted to extract the extreme observations was based on exceedance, or peaks-over-
threshold. Given an original variable X, a derived exceedance variable Y is constructed by taking only
the exceedances over a pre-determined threshold value, x0:
A threshold value corresponding to the 90th centile of each series was used to construct the exceedance
series. This means that only the ten percent highest events, in terms of intensity, magnitude and duration,
were retained for the analysis.
The probability distribution of an exceedance or peaks over threshold variate with random occurrence times
belongs to the Generalised Pareto (GP) family.
Although the GP distribution is very flexible due to its three parameters, there is a large uncertainty involved in estimating the shape parameter and it is frequently difficult to determine whether the estimates of differ
significantly from zero for a given sample. For this reason it is advisable to use the simpler Exponential
distribution instead of the GP, due its highest robustness.
L-moment plots where obtained as a graphical confirmation of the goodness of fit of the GP and the
Exponential distribution to the data series.
0xX=Y 0x>X
Under the Exponential distribution, and assuming Poisson distributed arrival times, the T-year return
period exceedance, YT, can be obtained as the (1 - 1/T) quantile in the distribution of the exceedances:
In our case, parameter estimates at ungauged locations were obtained as a mixture of a linear
regression and a local autoregressive component
T
xXT 1
log0
01
00
0ˆ xε+pλ+xzβ=xp j
m
=j
n
=iii
GIS-layers
LAT Latitude (km)
LONG Longitude (km)
D_SEA Distance to the Sea (km)
D_MED Distance to Mediterranean Sea (km)
D_ATL Distance to Atlantic Ocean (km)
ELEV Elevation (m)
ELEVx Average elevation (m) within x, where x is a circular window with radii of 2.5, 5, and 25 km
RAD Annual average incoming solar radiation (MJ × day)
RADx Annual average incoming solar radiation (MJ × day) within x, where x is a circular window with radii of 2.5, 5, and 25 km
SLOPE Slope gradient (%)
SLOPEx Average slope gradient (%) within x, where x is a circular window with radii of 2.5, 5, and 25 km
GIS-layers Spatial distribution of the Exponential distribution parameters and corresponding to annual series: 1) peak intensity ;
2) x0 peak intensity ; 3) magnitude ; 4) x0 magnitude ; 5) duration ; 6) x0 duration .
a) Average MAE MBE D
annual 4.39 0.24 0.03 0.92
autumn 1.09 0.06 0.01 0.92
winter 1.06 0.07 0.01 0.93
spring 1.24 0.07 <0.01 0.90
summer 1.01 0.08 0.02 0.95
b)
annual )(ˆ x 14.56 1.57 0.34 0.95
annual )(ˆ x 28.89 2.35 -0.44 0.95
autumn )(ˆ x 15.12 2.82 0.43 0.92
autumn )(ˆ x 34.38 3.07 -0.23 0.96
winter )(ˆ x 11.68 2.20 0.75 0.91
winter )(ˆ x 28.64 3.56 -1.34 0.93
spring )(ˆ x 10.71 1.96 -0.24 0.87
spring )(ˆ x 26.00 2.23 -0.51 0.93
summer )(ˆ x 11.92 2.05 -0.11 0.79
summer )(ˆ x 28.02 2.01 -0.32 0.89
c)
annual )(ˆ x 38.31 9.81 -7.22 0.75
annual )(ˆ x 41.02 8.58 5.27 0.82
autumn )(ˆ x 36.60 8.83 -4.28 0.85
autumn )(ˆ x 44.09 14.40 10.78 0.75
winter )(ˆ x 34.03 7.78 -3.13 0.84
winter )(ˆ x 41.89 14.69 9.52 0.78
spring )(ˆ x 29.08 7.31 -4.78 0.79
spring )(ˆ x 39.34 8.41 5.13 0.84
summer )(ˆ x 16.92 4.71 2.39 0.65
summer )(ˆ x 35.07 5.10 3.13 0.71
d)
annual )(ˆ x 1.69 0.19 0.04 0.94
annual )(ˆ x 4.01 0.31 0.04 0.96
autumn )(ˆ x 1.42 0.30 0.06 0.86
autumn )(ˆ x 3.96 0.30 0.02 0.95
winter )(ˆ x 1.53 0.26 0.05 0.92
winter )(ˆ x 4.50 0.41 0.09 0.96
spring )(ˆ x 1.58 0.32 0.02 0.86
spring )(ˆ x 4.37 0.42 0.00 0.94
summer )(ˆ x 1.22 0.35 -0.07 0.52
summer )(ˆ x 3.24 0.21 0.03 0.93
A good agreement was found in general between the regionalised parameters and the ones obtained by at-site analysis,
d) annual frequency of events;a) peak intensity; b) magnitude; c) duration
Spatial distribution of corresponding to seasonal series of peak intensity: 1) winter; 2) spring; 3)
summer; 4) autumn.
Average MAE MBE D
a)
annual 99.84 8.60 1.28 0.96 autumn 87.01 11.00 1.27 0.95 winter 68.73 8.94 1.26 0.95 spring 64.70 7.84 -1.46 0.91 summer 68.58 7.19 -0.43 0.88 b) annual 228.41 43.74 -29.78 0.85 autumn 172.03 25.26 -4.12 0.94 winter 159.05 25.51 -0.60 0.93 spring 144.82 23.54 -12.19 0.90 summer 92.79 20.44 11.85 0.70
c)
annual 12.27 1.17 0.26 0.96 autumn 8.92 1.25 0.23 0.92 winter 9.84 1.16 0.28 0.96 spring 10.10 1.31 0.08 0.93 summer 7.37 1.32 -0.14 0.70
2
Comparison between the quantile estimates of peak intensity, magnitude and duration for a return period of 30 years using spatially modelled (y axis) and at-site (x axis)
Exponential distribution parameter estimates, line of perfect fit (continuous) and regression line (dashed).
Annual quantiles maps corresponding to a return period of 30 years: 1) peak intensity (mm day-1); 2)
magnitude (mm); and 3) duration (days).
Error/accuracy statistics for annual and seasonal quantile estimates for a 30 years
return period: a) peak intensity; b) magnitude; and d) duration.
Seasonal quantile maps of peak intensity (mm day-1): 1) winter; 2) spring; 3) summer; and 4) autumn.
Seasonal quantile maps of magnitude (mm): 1) winter; 2) spring; 3) summer; and 4) autumn.
Seasonal quantile maps of duration (mm): 1) winter; 2) spring; 3) summer; and 4) autumn.
Regionalization of the study area as a function of the season in which the maximum quantile estimate is recorded: 1) peak
intensity; 2) magnitude; and 3) duration
Daily atmospheric circulation events and extreme precipitation risk in Northeast Spain: the role of the North Atlantic Oscillation, Western Mediterranean Oscillation,
and Mediterranean Oscillation
174 complete series of daily precipitation amounts with continuous data between 1950 and 2006 Sea-level-pressure points used to calculate the
daily atmospheric circulation indices.
Temporal evolution of daily NAO, WeMO, and MO indices between 1 October 2006 and 31 December
2006. Temporal evolution of October–March WeMO, NAO, and MO indices obtained from average daily and
monthly indices.
L-Skewness (
-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
L-K
urt
os
is (
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5Generalized Pareto Generalized Logistic
General extreme valuePearson III
Lognormal Wakeby
Normal
Exponential
L-Skewness (
-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
L-K
urt
os
is (
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
L-Skewness (
-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
L-K
urt
os
is (
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
L-Skewness (
-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7L
-Ku
rto
sis
(
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
POSITIVE NEGATIVE
POSITIVE NEGATIVE
MAGNITUDE
MAXIMUM INTENSITY
NAO
L-Skewness (
-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
L-K
urt
os
is (
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5Generalized Pareto Generalized Logistic
General extreme valuePearson III
Lognormal Wakeby
Normal
Exponential
L-Skewness (
-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
L-K
urt
os
is (
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
L-Skewness (
-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
L-K
urt
os
is (
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
L-Skewness (
-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
L-K
urt
os
is (
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
POSITIVE NEGATIVE
POSITIVE NEGATIVE
MAGNITUDE
MAXIMUM INTENSITY
WeMO
L-Skewness (
-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
L-K
urt
os
is (
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5Generalized Pareto Generalized Logistic
General extreme valuePearson III
Lognormal Wakeby
Normal
Exponential
L-Skewness (
-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
L-K
urt
os
is (
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
L-Skewness (
-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
L-K
urt
os
is (
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
L-Skewness (
-0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
L-K
urt
os
is (
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
POSITIVE NEGATIVE
POSITIVE NEGATIVE
MAGNITUDE
MAXIMUM INTENSITY
MO
L-Moment diagrams for series of the magnitude and maximum intensity of precipitation for positive and negative atmospheric circulation events. Each point
indicates the statistics for each observatory. Box-plot of the p-values obtained from the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Above: precipitation
intensity. Below: precipitation magnitude.
Zaragoza
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
Mag
nitu
de
0
100
200
300
400
500
PostiveNegative
MAGNITUDE
MAXIMUM INTENSITY
Castellón
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Monzón de Campos
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Articutza
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Barcelona
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Zaragoza
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
Max
imum
Inte
nsity
0
50
100
150
200
250
PostiveNegative
Castellón
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
50
100
150
200
250Monzón de Campos
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
50
100
150
200
250Articutza
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
50
100
150
200
250Barcelona
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
50
100
150
200
250
Zaragoza
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
Mag
nitu
de
0
100
200
300
400
500
PostiveNegative
MAGNITUDE
MAXIMUM INTENSITY
Castellón
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Monzón de Campos
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Articutza
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Barcelona
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Zaragoza
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
Max
imu
m In
tens
ity
0
50
100
150
200
250
PostiveNegative
Castellón
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
50
100
150
200
250Monzón de Campos
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
50
100
150
200
250Articutza
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
50
100
150
200
250Barcelona
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
50
100
150
200
250
Zaragoza
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
Mag
nitu
de
0
100
200
300
400
500
PostiveNegative
MAGNITUDE
MAXIMUM INTENSITY
Castellón
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Monzón de Campos
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Articutza
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Barcelona
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Zaragoza
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
Max
imu
m In
tens
ity
0
50
100
150
200
250
PostiveNegative
Castellón
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
50
100
150
200
250Monzón de Campos
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
50
100
150
200
250Articutza
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
50
100
150
200
250Barcelona
Centile
0 20 40 60 80 100
0
50
100
150
200
250
NAO
WeMO
MO
Centile values of precipitation magnitude and maximum intensity for positive and negative NAO,
WeMO and MO events for five representative observatories.
pp-plots between the empirical distribution and the modeled Generalised Pareto distribution for precipitation intensity series in five representative observatories corresponding to the positive and negative phases of the
three atmospheric circulation patterns. a) Zaragoza; b) Castellón; c) Monzón de Campos; d) Articutza; e) Barcelona.
Probability of maximum intensity of precipitation exceeding 50 mm and total magnitude exceeding 100 mm corresponding to positive and negative NAO, WeMO, and MO events following a GP distribution.
Quantile maps of maximum daily precipitation and total magnitude during NOA, WeMO, and MO events corresponding to a return period of 50 years.
Vicente-Serrano S.M., Santiago Beguería, Juan I. López-Moreno, Ahmed M. El Kenawy y Marta Angulo. Daily atmospheric circulation events and extreme precipitation risk in Northeast Spain: the role of the North Atlantic Oscillation, Western Mediterranean Oscillation,
and Mediterranean Oscillation. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmosphere. In press
Acronym Definitions Unit
P Total precipitation mm
WD Number of wet days (precipitation >1 mm) days
PI Simple daily intensity (P/WD) mm
C90 Annual 90th percentile mm
R90N Nº of events with precipitation greater than long-term 90th percentile (P90)
days
R90T Percentage of total precipitation from events above P90 %
R5GD Greatest 5-day total precipitation mm
WS Max Nº of consecutive wet days (precipitation >1 mm) days
DS Max Nº of consecutive dry days (precipitation <1 mm) days
Acronyms and definition of the nine selected precipitation indices.
Indices Annual DJF MAM JJA SON - o + - o + - o + - o + - o + P 68 32 0 58 41 0 42 57 0 46 53 0 20 73 7 WD 54 39 7 59 38 3 41 52 7 55 43 2 2 72 26 PI 44 42 14 35 49 16 34 55 11 30 55 15 52 44 3 C90 41 48 11 26 61 13 28 60 12 28 56 16 39 57 35 R90N 49 46 5 34 60 6 27 69 4 32 63 5 32 61 7 R90T 29 62 9 17 74 9 12 76 12 21 65 14 31 62 7 R5GD 44 50 6 37 60 3 32 66 2 38 59 3 24 69 7 WS 30 61 9 34 62 4 25 63 12 50 47 3 8 72 19 DS 5 57 38 4 73 23 0.1 85 14 9 60 31 20 71 9 Percentage of observatories with positive (+, < 0.05), unchanged
(o, < 0.05) and negative (, < 0.05) trends in precipitation indices.
Trends in daily precipitation on the northeastern Iberian Peninsula, 19552006
Spatial distribution of annual trends
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
WD-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
P
A B C r=0.14r=0.61 r=0.65
PI R5GD
5A 5B
PI
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
C90
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
R5GD
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0
r=0.88 r=0.64A B
Seasonal differences
Winter Autumn
Daily maximum and minimum temperature records