1
Study of a solar concentrator for space based on a diffractive/refractive optical combination Céline Michel* (FRIA PhD Student), Jérôme Loicq, Fabian Languy, Alexandra Mazzoli & Serge Habraken Centre Spatial de Liège - Université de Liège * [email protected] Context : satellites needs Solar concentration : # solar cells/m² cost Spectrum splitting Combination Current matching condition power limited by the worst cell Lattice matching condition at the interfaces Space environment specific thermal conditions desired solar concentration about 10 × Total power = Σ powers Free choice of materials R Ʌ bfl Off-axis F# = bfl/2R Blazed diffraction grating Splitting 1 st diffraction order Near IR - visible - UV cell Cylindrical refractive Fresnel lens Concentration I Different configurations have been studied : the results are promising A thermal simulation is necessary to know the maximal concentration that can be achieved without damaging the cells Next steps : thermal simulation and validation Cell efficiency when the temperature Space: no convection heat transfer is difficult hot spots appear on solar cells First configuration Diameter = 50mm F# = 3 Ʌ = 38,7μm Off-axis = 24mm Output power 290W/m² Optical efficiency > 70% Geometrical concentration ratio 12,5x and 14,3x Symmetrical design Diameter of each lens = 50mm F# = 3 Ʌ = 20μm Off-axis of each lens = 25mm Output power >300W/m² Optical efficiency > 75% Geometrical concentration ratio 9,8x and 12,22x Hypothesis : Sun divergence (±0,26°), AM0 spectrum, cell temperature = 65°C. Fresnel reflections and shadowing of the grooves are taken into account, diffraction efficiencies of the grating are computed from the scalar diffraction theory. The shapes of the Fresnel lens (in DC93-500 silicone) and of the diffraction grating are ideal (no draft angles, no rugosity, …). Light scattering is not included in the model. 5.1 mm 5.1 mm 8.2 mm With secondary concentrators Diameter = 50mm F# = 3 Ʌ = 20μm Off-axis = 32mm α 0 = 62,8 α 1 = 85,2 IR cell VIS cell Left mirror Right mirror IR cell VIS cell IR VIS IR -0,93° -0,8° 0,35° Received power [W/mm².nm] IR cell IR cell Visible cell λ[nm] Output power 290W/m² Optical efficiency > 70% Geometrical concentration ratio 15x and 7,5x 0 th diffraction order IR cell Λ [μm] Off-axis [mm] Distance between focal spots Sum of focal spots sizes Maximum geometrical concentration ratio (Ʌ, off-axis, F#) are related minimum encountered for distance = 0 Design and optimization : a lot of constraints a compromise must be found e 1 < e 2 small F# bfl 1 bfl 2 error 1 error 2 distance > 0 d The best tracking tolerance Max 2 nd order diffracted light collection recovery large Ʌ Thermal constraints C geo is limited Maximum total output power λ [nm] Max(P 0 +P 1 ) λ blaze fixed AM0. AM0. large Ʌ and small off-axis Λ [μm] Off-axis [mm] η lens [%] η lens [%] F# Maximum lens transmission efficiency large F# Order 0 Order 1 Min Overlapping between the spots

PowerPoint Presentation · 2013. 5. 23. · Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: ��Michel C�line Created Date: 4/4/2013 4:32:03 PM

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PowerPoint Presentation · 2013. 5. 23. · Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: ��Michel C�line Created Date: 4/4/2013 4:32:03 PM

Study of a solar concentrator for space

based on a diffractive/refractive optical combination Céline Michel* (FRIA PhD Student), Jérôme Loicq, Fabian Languy, Alexandra Mazzoli & Serge Habraken

Centre Spatial de Liège - Université de Liège * [email protected]

Context : satellites needs

Solar concentration : # solar cells/m² ↓ → cost ↓

Spectrum splitting Combination

Current matching condition → power limited by the worst cell

Lattice matching condition at the interfaces

Space environment → specific thermal conditions → desired solar concentration about 10 ×

Total power = Σ powers

Free choice of materials

R Ʌ

bfl

Off-axis

F# = bfl/2R

Blazed diffraction grating Splitting

1st diffraction order Near IR - visible - UV cell

Cylindrical refractive

Fresnel lens Concentration

I

Different configurations have been studied : the results are promising

A thermal simulation is necessary to know the maximal concentration

that can be achieved without damaging the cells

Next steps : thermal simulation and validation • Cell efficiency ↓ when the temperature ↑ • Space: no convection heat transfer is difficult

hot spots appear on solar cells

First configuration

Diameter = 50mm

F# = 3

Ʌ = 38,7µm

Off-axis = 24mm

Output power

290W/m²

Optical efficiency

> 70%

Geometrical

concentration ratio

12,5x and 14,3x

Symmetrical design

Diameter of each lens = 50mm

F# = 3

Ʌ = 20µm

Off-axis of each lens = 25mm

Output power

>300W/m²

Optical efficiency

> 75%

Geometrical

concentration ratio

9,8x and 12,22x

Hypothesis : Sun divergence (±0,26°), AM0 spectrum, cell temperature = 65°C.

Fresnel reflections and shadowing of the grooves are taken into account,

diffraction efficiencies of the grating are computed from the scalar diffraction

theory. The shapes of the Fresnel lens (in DC93-500 silicone) and of the

diffraction grating are ideal (no draft angles, no rugosity, …). Light scattering is

not included in the model.

5.1 mm 5.1 mm 8.2 mm

With secondary concentrators

Diameter = 50mm

F# = 3

Ʌ = 20µm

Off-axis = 32mm

α0 = 62,8

α1 = 85,2

IR cell VIS cell

Left mirror Right mirror

IR cell VIS cell IR VIS IR

-0,93° -0,8° 0,35°

Received power [W/mm².nm]

IR cell IR cell Visible cell

λ[nm] Output power

290W/m²

Optical efficiency

> 70%

Geometrical

concentration ratio

15x and 7,5x

0th diffraction order

IR cell

Λ [µm] Off-axis [mm]

Distance between focal spots

Sum of focal spots sizes

Maximum

geometrical concentration ratio

→ (Ʌ, off-axis, F#) are related

→ minimum encountered for distance = 0

Design and optimization : a lot of constraints → a compromise must be found

e1 < e2 → small F#

bfl1 bfl2

error1

error2

→ distance > 0

d

The best

tracking tolerance

Max 2nd order diffracted light collection

recovery → large Ʌ Thermal constraints → Cgeo is limited

Maximum total output power

λ [nm]

Max(P0+P1)

→ λblaze fixed

AM0.

AM0.

→ large Ʌ and small off-axis

Λ [µm] Off-axis [mm]

ηlens[%]

ηlens[%]

F#

Maximum

lens transmission efficiency

→ large F#

Order 0

Order 1

Min

Overlapping between the spots