81
Tratamiento actual del cáncer renal Guillermo de Velasco MD, PhD Medical Oncologist University Hospital 12 de Octubre @H12O_GUCancer @g_develasco

Tratamiento actual del cáncer renal - doctaforum.com 9.1.pdf · Tratamiento actual del cáncer renal Guillermo de Velasco MD, PhD Medical Oncologist @H12O_GUCancer. University Hospital

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Tratamiento actual del cáncer renal

    Guillermo de Velasco MD, PhD

    Medical Oncologist

    University Hospital 12 de Octubre@H12O_GUCancer@g_develasco

  • Índice

    1. Intro

    2. Opciones terapeuticas y por qué usarlas

    3. Qué fármacos hay disponibles. Beneficios/riesgos

  • Índice

    1. Intro

    2. Opciones terapeuticas y por qué usarlas

    3. Qué fármacos hay disponibles. Beneficios/riesgos

  • Epidemiología

    • 2-3% de todos los tumores

  • Molecular Abnormalities of Kidney Cancer

  • Clear cell Non-clearcell

    Eble JN, 2006;

    2006 2014

    Delahunt B et al. Urology 2014

  • Índice

    1. Intro

    2. Opciones terapéuticas y por qué usarlas

    3. Qué fármacos hay disponibles. Beneficios/riesgos

  • Opciones terapéuticas

    ENFERMEDAD LOCALIZADA

    ENFERMEDAD METASTÁSICA

  • Advanced/Metastatic RCC

    • ~20% of patients present with metastatic disease

    • ~30% of individuals treated for localized disease

    experience recurrence with distant disease

    – Metastases: Lung, lymph node, bone, liver, brain…

  • Nomogramas

  • ASSURE Trial

    N. Haas, et al. Lancet 2016.

  • S-TRAC

    A. Ravaud et al. NEJM 2016

  • Opciones terapéuticas para cáncer renal metastásico

  • Opciones terapéuticas para cáncer renal metastásico

    Observación Cirugía

    Tratamiento sistémico

  • Opciones terapéuticas para cáncer renal metastásico

    Observación Cirugía

    Tratamiento sistémico

  • Rini et al. Lancet Oncol 2016 16

  • Opciones terapéuticas para cáncer renal metastásico

    Observación Cirugía

    Tratamiento sistémico

  • Metástasis Tumor Primario

  • Metástasis Tumor Primario

  • Factores Pronósticos

    Motzer RJ et al J Clin Oncol 1999; 17:2530-40

  • Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients withSynchronous Metastases from Renal Cell

    23

  • Seleccionar los casos

    24

  • Opciones terapéuticas para cáncer renal metastásico

    Observación Cirugía

    Tratamiento sistémico

  • Índice

    1. Intro

    2. Opciones terapeuticas y por qué usarlas

    3. Qué fármacos hay disponibles. Beneficios/riesgos

  • Rapid drug development provides more choices

    Presented By Thomas Hutson at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

  • Tratamientos sistémicos 1L

  • Tratamientos sistémicos 2L

  • Tipos de tratamientos

    Citocinas Antiangiogénicos

    Inhibidores de mTOR Inmunoterapia

  • Tipos de tratamientos

    Citocinas Antiangiogénicos

    Inhibidores de mTOR Inmunoterapia

  • High dose IL-2 for RCC

  • Estudios con IL2 y ORR

  • Biomarker?Drugs Biomarker Clinically

    indicated

    HD-IL2 CAIX NO

    VEGF/VEGFR PBRM1/BAP1 NO

    mTOR pathway TSC1/TSC2/mTOR NO

    PD1/PDL1 abs PD1/PD-L1 NO

  • Tipos de tratamientos

    Citocinas Antiangiogénicos

    Inhibidores de mTOR Inmunoterapia

  • RCC Is a Highly Vascular Tumor

    Presented By Thomas Hutson at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

  • Regulation of HIF by pVHL

    Signoretti, Choueiri and Kaelin. Molecular Abnormalities in Kidney Cancer, in The Molecular Basis of Cancer, 4th Edition (Chapter 39).

  • The Cancer Genome Atlas

  • CJ Creighton et al. Nature 000, 1-7 (2013) doi:10.1038/nature12222

    Somatic alterations in ccRCC.

  • Therapeutic biological pathways in renal-cell carcinoma

    Rini et al. Lancet Oncology 2009

  • Targeted Agents for Advanced RCCFirst line

    Agent Target Efficacy in Randomized Phase III Trials

    Comparison No. ORR PFS OS

    Bevacizumab VEGF IFN-alfa +/- bevacizumabIFN-alfa +/- bevacizumab

    649732

    31 vs 1326 vs 13

    10.2 vs 5.48.5 vs 5.2

    Sunitinib VEGF-R Sunitinib vs IFN-alfa 750 37 vs 9 11.1 vs 5

    Sorafenib VEGF-R Sorafenib vs Placebo 903 10 vs 2 5.5 vs 2.8

    Pazopanib VEGF-R Pazopanib vs Placebo 435 30 vs 0 11.1 vs 2.8

    Pazopanib VEGF-R Pazopanib vs Sunitinib 1110 31 vs 24 10.5 vs 10.2

  • Con tantos fármacoscomo elegimos?

  • Phase III non-inferiority Trial of Pazopanib vs. Sunitinib (N=1110)

    PazopanibSunitinib

    N Median PFS (95% CI)

    Pazopanib 557 8.4 mo (8.3, 10.9)Sunitinib 553 9.5 mo (8.3, 11.1)

    HR (95% CI ) 1.047 (0.898,1.220)

    Motzer, Hutson and Choueir i. NEJM 2013

  • Hair color changeWeight decreasedSerum ALT increasedAlopeciaUpper abdominal painSerum AST increasedFatigueRashPain in extremityConstipationTaste AlterationLDH increasedSerum creatinine increasedPeripheral edemaHand-foot syndromeDyspepsiaPyrexiaLeukopeniaHypothyroidismEpistaxisSerum TSH increasedMucositisNeutropeniaAnemiaThrombocytopenia

    Relative Risk in Adverse EventsAE occurrence ≥10% in either arm; 95% CI for RR does not cross 1

    Favors pazopanib Favors sunitinibMotzer, Huston and Choueiri, NEJM 2013

    Chart1

    3.141.0310.783

    2.521.180.807

    1.740.4320.34

    1.650.690.488

    1.510.6320.452

    1.490.3830.299

    0.870.0890.084

    0.770.2030.165

    0.730.2460.186

    0.720.1870.156

    0.710.1450.113

    0.670.3110.219

    0.660.2420.173

    0.640.2310.168

    0.590.0940.087

    0.580.1670.13

    0.540.2110.153

    0.510.1970.135

    0.50.1520.119

    0.490.1880.136

    0.460.240.152

    0.430.1340.105

    0.410.130.096

    0.360.1590.104

    Y-Values

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    0.2

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    0.1779661017

    Sheet1

    X-ValuesY-ValuesSize

    3.1410.22.3574.1710.7831.031

    2.5220.17796610171.7133.70.8071.18

    1.7430.17796610171.42.1720.340.432

    1.6540.17796610171.1622.340.4880.69

    1.5150.17796610171.0582.1420.4520.632

    1.4960.17796610171.1911.8730.2990.383

    0.8770.17796610170.7860.9590.0840.089

    0.7780.17796610170.6050.9730.1650.203

    0.7390.17796610170.5440.9760.1860.246

    0.72100.17796610170.5640.9070.1560.187

    0.71110.17796610170.5970.8550.1130.145

    0.67120.17796610170.4510.9810.2190.311

    0.66130.17796610170.4870.9020.1730.242

    0.64140.17796610170.4720.8710.1680.231

    0.59150.17796610170.5030.6840.0870.094

    0.58160.17796610170.450.7470.130.167

    0.54170.17796610170.3870.7510.1530.211

    0.51180.17796610170.3750.7070.1350.197

    0.5190.17796610170.3810.6520.1190.152

    0.49200.17796610170.3540.6780.1360.188

    0.46210.17796610170.3080.70.1520.24

    0.43220.17796610170.3250.5640.1050.134

    0.41230.17796610170.3140.540.0960.13

    0.36240.17796610170.2560.5190.1040.159

    0.3250.17796610170.2320.40.0680.1

    To resize chart data range, drag lower right corner of range.

  • A Fay et a. JNCCN 2016

  • Biomarker?Drugs Biomarker Clinically

    indicated

    HD-IL2 CAIX NO

    VEGF/VEGFR PBRM1/BAP1 NO

    mTOR pathway TSC1/TSC2/mTOR NO

    PD1/PDL1 abs PD1/PD-L1 NO

  • In-vitro potency of VEGFR inhibitors

    Presented By Thomas Hutson at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

  • Drug Exposure (AUC) = > efficacy (RR, PFS, OS)

    Presented By Thomas Hutson at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

  • Segunda línea con antiangiogénicos

    • Axitinib

    • Cabozantinib

  • Role of MET, VEGF, and AXL in RCC

    Presented By Toni Choueiri at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

  • METEOR Study Design

    Presented By Toni Choueiri at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

  • PFS and Response in All 658 Patients

    Presented By Toni Choueiri at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

  • Overall Survival

    Presented By Toni Choueiri at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

  • Tipos de tratamientos

    Citocinas Antiangiogénicos

    Inhibidores de mTOR Inmunoterapia

  • Therapeutic biological pathways in renal-cell carcinoma

    Rini et al. Lancet Oncology 2009

  • Inhibidores de mTOR

    • Everolimus

    • Temsirolimus

  • Algún biomarcador para inhibidores de mTOR

  • Biomarker?Drugs Biomarker Clinically

    indicated

    HD-IL2 CAIX NO

    VEGF/VEGFR PBRM1/BAP1 NO

    mTOR pathway TSC1/TSC2/mTOR NO

    PD1/PDL1 abs PD1/PD-L1 NO

  • Tipos de tratamientos

    Citocinas Antiangiogénicos

    Inhibidores de mTOR Inmunoterapia

  • Targeting VEGFR and FGFR
    Lenvatinib Phase II Study (N = 150)

    Presented By Thomas Hutson at 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting

  • Tipos de tratamientos

    Citocinas Antiangiogénicos

    Inhibidores de mTOR Inmunoterapia

  • Immune Checkpoints Inhibitors

  • Checkmate-25 Study design

    Previously treated mRCC

    Stratification factorsRegion

    MSKCC risk groupNumber of prior anti-angiogenic therapies

    3 mg/kg intravenously every two

    weeksNivolumab

    Everolimus10 mg orally once daily

    Ran

    dom

    ize

    1:1

    • PRIMARY EDNPOINT: OS• Treatment beyond progression was permitted if drug was tolerated and

    clinical benefit was notedMSKCC, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

  • Overall survivalMedian OS, months (95% CI)

    Nivolumab 25.0 (21.8–NE)Everolimus 19.6 (17.6–23.1)

    HR (98.5% CI): 0.73 (0.57–0.93)P = 0.0018

    0 3 6 129 15Months

    18 21 24 27 30 33

    No. of patients at riskNivolumab 410 389 359 337 305 275 213 139 73 29 3 0

    411 366 324 287 265 241 187 115 61 20 2 0Everolimus

    0.0

    0.3

    0.1

    0.2

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1.0

    Ove

    rall

    Surv

    ival

    (Pro

    babi

    lity)

    Nivolumab

    Everolimus

    Minimum follow-up was 14 months.NE, not estimable. Motzer, NEJM 2015

  • Biomarker?Drugs Biomarker Clinically

    indicated

    HD-IL2 CAIX NO

    VEGF/VEGFR PBRM1/BAP1 NO

    mTOR pathway TSC1/TSC2/mTOR NO

    PD1/PDL1 abs PD1/PD-L1 NO

  • Phase 3 combination trials in advanced RCC

    Phase III N=1070Co-Primary endpoint: PFS, OS

    Checkmate214 - NCT02231749: Combination PD-1 + CTLA-4

    inhibition

    RANDOMISATION

    Nivolumab+

    IpilimumabSunitinib

    Phase III N=830Co-Primary endpoint: PFS, OS

    IMmotion151 - NCT02420821: Combination PD-L1 + VEGF

    inhibition

    RANDOMISATION

    MPDL3280A+

    BevacizumabSunitinib

    Phase III N=583Primary endpoint: PFS

    Javelin Renal 101 - NCT02684006: Combination PD-L1 + VEGFR TK

    inhibition

    RANDOMISATION

    Avelumab+

    AxitinibSunitinib

    Phase III N=840Co-Primary endpoint: PFS, OS

    Keynote426 - NCT02853331: Combination PD-1 + VEGFR TK

    inhibition

    RANDOMISATION

    Pembrolizumab +Axitinib Sunitinib

    Phase III N=735Primary endpoint: PFS

    CLEAR - NCT02811861:Combination VEGFR TK + mTOR/PD-L1

    inhibition

    RANDOMISATION

    Lenvatinib+

    EverolimusSunitinib

    Lenvatinib+

    Pembro

  • Conclusiones La cirugía es muy relevante en el cáncer renal

    El cáncer renal metastásico puede ser potencialmente curable

    Los antiangiogénicos han cambiado la historiaclínica de estos tumores

    La inmunoterapia con ICI siguen trasformando la historia de estos tumores

    Combinaciones versus Secuenciación?

    No hay ningún biomarcador

  • Muchas gracias

  • Molecular Abnormalities of Kidney Cancer

  • Multistep Kidney Cancer Carcinogenesis

    Inactivating mutation

    Signoretti, Choueiri and Kaelin. Molecular Abnormalities in Kidney Cancer, in The Molecular Basis of Cancer, 4th Edition (Chapter 39).

  • The Cancer Genome Atlas

  • Número de diapositiva 1ÍndiceÍndiceEpidemiologíaMolecular Abnormalities of Kidney CancerNúmero de diapositiva 6ÍndiceOpciones terapéuticasAdvanced/Metastatic RCCNomogramasASSURE TrialS-TRACOpciones terapéuticas para cáncer renal metastásicoOpciones terapéuticas para cáncer renal metastásicoOpciones terapéuticas para cáncer renal metastásicoNúmero de diapositiva 16Opciones terapéuticas para cáncer renal metastásicoNúmero de diapositiva 18Número de diapositiva 19Número de diapositiva 20Número de diapositiva 21Factores PronósticosCytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients with Synchronous Metastases from Renal Cell�Seleccionar los casosOpciones terapéuticas para cáncer renal metastásicoÍndiceRapid drug development provides more choicesTratamientos sistémicos 1LTratamientos sistémicos 2LTipos de tratamientosTipos de tratamientosHigh dose IL-2 for RCCEstudios con IL2 y ORRBiomarker?Tipos de tratamientosRCC Is a Highly Vascular TumorNúmero de diapositiva 37Número de diapositiva 38Número de diapositiva 39The Cancer Genome AtlasNúmero de diapositiva 41Therapeutic biological pathways in renal-cell carcinomaTargeted Agents for Advanced RCC�First lineCon tantos fármacos� como elegimos?�Phase III non-inferiority Trial of Pazopanib vs. Sunitinib (N=1110)�Número de diapositiva 46Número de diapositiva 47Biomarker?In-vitro potency of VEGFR inhibitorsDrug Exposure (AUC) = > efficacy (RR, PFS, OS)Segunda línea con antiangiogénicosNúmero de diapositiva 52Role of MET, VEGF, and AXL in RCCMETEOR Study DesignPFS and Response in All 658 PatientsOverall SurvivalTipos de tratamientosTherapeutic biological pathways in renal-cell carcinomaInhibidores de mTORNúmero de diapositiva 60Algún biomarcador para inhibidores de mTORNúmero de diapositiva 62Número de diapositiva 63Número de diapositiva 64Biomarker?Tipos de tratamientosNúmero de diapositiva 67Targeting VEGFR and FGFR
    Lenvatinib Phase II Study (N = 150)Tipos de tratamientosNúmero de diapositiva 70Checkmate-25 Study designOverall survivalBiomarker?Número de diapositiva 74Phase 3 combination trials in advanced RCCConclusionesMuchas graciasMolecular Abnormalities of Kidney CancerNúmero de diapositiva 79The Cancer Genome AtlasNúmero de diapositiva 81