4. Minutes of Discussions
Cat
egor
yE
nviro
nmen
tal
Item
Mai
n C
heck
Item
sS
tatu
sC
onfir
mat
ion
of E
nviro
nmen
tal C
onsi
dera
tions
(Rea
sons
, Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res)
(1)
EIA
and
Env
ironm
enta
lP
erm
its
(a)
Hav
e E
IA r
epor
ts b
een
alre
ady
prep
ared
in o
ffici
al p
roce
ss?
(b)
Hav
e E
IA r
epor
ts b
een
appr
oved
by
auth
oriti
es o
f the
hos
t cou
ntry
'sgo
vern
men
t?(c
) H
ave
EIA
rep
orts
bee
n un
cond
ition
ally
app
rove
d? If
con
ditio
ns a
reim
pose
d on
the
appr
oval
of E
IA r
epor
ts, a
re th
e co
nditi
ons
satis
fied?
(d)
In a
dditi
on to
the
abov
e ap
prov
als,
hav
e ot
her
requ
ired
envi
ronm
enta
lpe
rmits
bee
n ob
tain
ed fr
om th
e ap
prop
riate
reg
ulat
ory
auth
oriti
es o
f the
host
cou
ntry
's g
over
nmen
t?
(a)
Yes
(b)
Yes
(c)
No
(d)
Unr
elat
ed
(a)
Dur
ing
the
mis
sion
of D
BD
in M
ay 2
011,
NP
A s
ubm
it th
e do
cum
ents
for
EIA
lice
nse
appl
icat
ion
to S
LEA
PA
.(b
) O
n 24
th J
une,
201
1, S
LEP
A r
eplie
d by
the
offic
ial l
ette
r to
NP
A th
atth
is P
roje
ct d
id n
ot n
eed,
but
nee
ded
to s
ubm
it th
e E
nviro
nmen
tal a
ndS
ocia
l Man
agem
ent P
lan
(ES
MP
). N
PA
sub
mitt
ed E
SM
P to
SLE
PA
.(c
) S
ame
as A
ttach
men
t 1 E
nviro
nmen
tal C
heck
list
(d)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t
(2)
Exp
lana
tion
toth
e Lo
cal
Sta
keho
lder
s
(a)
Hav
e co
nten
ts o
f the
pro
ject
and
the
pote
ntia
l im
pact
s be
enad
equa
tely
exp
lain
ed to
the
Loca
l sta
keho
lder
s ba
sed
on a
ppro
pria
tepr
oced
ures
, inc
ludi
ng in
form
atio
n di
sclo
sure
? Is
und
erst
andi
ng o
btai
ned
from
the
Loca
l sta
keho
lder
s?(b
) H
ave
the
com
men
t fro
m th
e st
akeh
olde
rs (
such
as
loca
l res
iden
ts)
been
ref
lect
ed to
the
proj
ect d
esig
n?
(a)
Und
er p
repa
ratio
n(b
) U
nder
pre
para
tion
(a)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t(b
) S
ame
as A
ttach
men
t 1 E
nviro
nmen
tal C
heck
list
(3)
Exa
min
atio
nof
Alte
rnat
ives
(a)
Hav
e al
tern
ativ
e pl
ans
of th
e pr
ojec
t bee
n ex
amin
ed w
ith s
ocia
l and
envi
ronm
enta
l con
side
ratio
ns?
(a)
Yes
(a)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t
2 P
ollu
tion
Con
trol
(1)
Wat
er Q
ualit
y
(a)
Is th
ere
any
poss
ibili
ty th
at s
oil r
unof
f fro
m th
e ba
re la
nds
resu
lting
from
ear
thm
ovin
g ac
tiviti
es, s
uch
as c
uttin
g an
d fil
ling
will
cau
se w
ater
qual
ity d
egra
datio
n in
dow
nstr
eam
wat
er a
reas
? If
the
wat
er q
ualit
yde
grad
atio
n is
ant
icip
ated
, are
ade
quat
e m
easu
res
cons
ider
ed?
(a)
No
(a)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t
(1)
Pro
tect
edA
reas
(a)
Is th
e pr
ojec
t site
loca
ted
in p
rote
cted
are
as d
esig
nate
d by
the
coun
try’
s la
ws
or in
tern
atio
nal t
reat
ies
and
conv
entio
ns?
Is th
ere
a po
ssib
ility
that
the
proj
ect w
ill a
ffect
the
prot
ecte
d ar
eas?
(a)
No
(a)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t
(2)
Eco
syst
em
(a)
Doe
s th
e pr
ojec
t site
enc
ompa
ss p
rimev
al fo
rest
s, tr
opic
al r
ain
fore
sts,
ecol
ogic
ally
val
uabl
e ha
bita
ts (
e.g.
, cor
al r
eefs
, man
grov
es, o
r tid
al fl
ats)
?(b
) D
oes
the
proj
ect s
ite e
ncom
pass
the
prot
ecte
d ha
bita
ts o
f end
ange
red
spec
ies
desi
gnat
ed b
y th
e co
untr
y’s
law
s or
inte
rnat
iona
l tre
atie
s an
dco
nven
tions
?(c
) If
sign
ifica
nt e
colo
gica
l im
pact
s ar
e an
ticip
ated
, are
ade
quat
epr
otec
tion
mea
sure
s ta
ken
to r
educ
e th
e im
pact
s on
the
ecos
yste
m?
(d)
Are
ade
quat
e m
easu
res
take
n to
pre
vent
dis
rupt
ion
of m
igra
tion
rout
esan
d ha
bita
t fra
gmen
tatio
n of
wild
life
and
lives
tock
?(e
) Is
ther
e an
y po
ssib
ility
that
the
proj
ect w
ill c
ause
the
nega
tive
impa
cts,
such
as
dest
ruct
ion
of fo
rest
, poa
chin
g, d
eser
tific
atio
n, r
educ
tion
inw
etla
nd a
reas
, and
dis
turb
ance
of e
cosy
stem
due
to in
trod
uctio
n of
exo
tic(n
on-n
ativ
e in
vasi
ve)
spec
ies
and
pest
s? A
re a
dequ
ate
mea
sure
s fo
rpr
even
ting
such
impa
cts
cons
ider
ed?
(f)
In c
ases
whe
re th
e pr
ojec
t site
is lo
cate
d in
und
evel
oped
are
as, i
s th
ere
any
poss
ibili
ty th
at th
e ne
w d
evel
opm
ent w
ill r
esul
t in
exte
nsiv
e lo
ss o
fna
tura
l env
ironm
ents
?
(a)
No
(b)
No
(c)
No
(d)
No
(e)
No
(f)
No
(a)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t(b
) S
ame
as A
ttach
men
t 1 E
nviro
nmen
tal C
heck
list
(c)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t(d
) S
ame
as A
ttach
men
t 1 E
nviro
nmen
tal C
heck
list
(e)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t(f
) S
ame
as A
ttach
men
t 1 E
nviro
nmen
tal C
heck
list
Sup
plem
ent t
o A
ttach
men
t 1 E
nviro
nmen
tal C
heck
list
At t
he s
tage
of D
raft
Fin
al R
epor
t, th
e pr
ogre
ss is
con
firm
ed a
s fo
llow
s;
1 P
erm
its a
ndE
xpla
natio
n
3 N
atur
alE
nviro
nmen
t
7. Environmental Checklist and Monitoring Plan
A-7-5
Cat
egor
yE
nviro
nmen
tal
Item
Mai
n C
heck
Item
sS
tatu
sC
onfir
mat
ion
of E
nviro
nmen
tal C
onsi
dera
tions
(Rea
sons
, Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res)
3 N
atur
alE
nviro
nmen
t(3
) T
opog
raph
yan
d G
eolo
gy
(a)
Is th
ere
any
soft
grou
nd o
n th
e ro
ute
of p
ower
tran
smis
sion
and
dist
ribut
ion
lines
that
may
cau
se s
lope
failu
res
or la
ndsl
ides
? A
read
equa
te m
easu
res
cons
ider
ed to
pre
vent
slo
pe fa
ilure
s or
land
slid
es,
whe
re n
eede
d?(b
) Is
ther
e an
y po
ssib
ility
that
civ
il w
orks
, suc
h as
cut
ting
and
fillin
g w
illca
use
slop
e fa
ilure
s or
land
slid
es?
Are
ade
quat
e m
easu
res
cons
ider
ed to
prev
ent s
lope
failu
res
or la
ndsl
ides
?(c
) Is
ther
e a
poss
ibili
ty th
at s
oil r
unof
f will
res
ult f
rom
cut
and
fill
area
s,w
aste
soi
l dis
posa
l site
s, a
nd b
orro
w s
ites?
Are
ade
quat
e m
easu
res
take
nto
pre
vent
soi
l run
off?
(a)
No
(b)
No
(c)
No
(a)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t(b
) S
ame
as A
ttach
men
t 1 E
nviro
nmen
tal C
heck
list
(c)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t
(1)
Res
ettle
men
t
(a)
Is in
volu
ntar
y re
settl
emen
t cau
sed
by p
roje
ct im
plem
enta
tion?
Ifin
volu
ntar
y re
settl
emen
t is
caus
ed, a
re e
ffort
s m
ade
to m
inim
ize
the
impa
cts
caus
ed b
y th
e re
settl
emen
t?(b
) Is
ade
quat
e ex
plan
atio
n on
com
pens
atio
n an
d re
settl
emen
t ass
ista
nce
give
n to
affe
cted
peo
ple
prio
r to
res
ettle
men
t?(c
) Is
the
rese
ttlem
ent p
lan,
incl
udin
g co
mpe
nsat
ion
with
full
repl
acem
ent
cost
s, r
esto
ratio
n of
live
lihoo
ds a
nd li
ving
sta
ndar
ds d
evel
oped
bas
ed o
nso
cioe
cono
mic
stu
dies
on
rese
ttlem
ent?
(d)
Are
the
com
pens
atio
ns g
oing
to b
e pa
id p
rior
to th
e re
settl
emen
t?(e
) A
re th
e co
mpe
nsat
ion
polic
ies
prep
ared
in d
ocum
ent?
(f)
Doe
s th
e re
settl
emen
t pla
n pa
y pa
rtic
ular
atte
ntio
n to
vul
nera
ble
grou
psor
peo
ple,
incl
udin
g w
omen
, chi
ldre
n, th
e el
derly
, peo
ple
belo
w th
epo
vert
y lin
e, e
thni
c m
inor
ities
, and
indi
geno
us p
eopl
es?
(g)
Are
agr
eem
ents
with
the
affe
cted
peo
ple
obta
ined
prio
r to
rese
ttlem
ent?
(h)
Is th
e or
gani
zatio
nal f
ram
ewor
k es
tabl
ishe
d to
pro
perly
impl
emen
tre
settl
emen
t? A
re th
e ca
paci
ty a
nd b
udge
t sec
ured
to im
plem
ent t
hepl
an?
(i) A
re a
ny p
lans
dev
elop
ed to
mon
itor
the
impa
cts
of r
eset
tlem
ent?
(j) Is
the
grie
vanc
e re
dres
s m
echa
nism
est
ablis
hed?
(a)
Yes
(b)
Und
er p
repa
ratio
n
(c)
Und
er p
repa
ratio
n(d
) Y
es(e
) U
nder
pre
para
tion
(f)
Yes
(g)
Und
er p
repa
ratio
n(h
) Y
es(i)
Yes
(j) Y
es
(a)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t(b
) D
urin
g th
e pr
epar
atio
n of
the
sim
ple
Res
setle
men
t Act
ion
Pla
n (R
AP
),N
PA
foun
d th
at th
ey n
eed
the
supp
ort f
rom
Min
istr
y of
Ene
rgy
and
Wat
erR
esou
rces
(M
EW
R).
. The
refo
re, N
PA
issu
ed th
e le
tter
to M
EW
R o
n th
ere
ques
t of c
oope
ratio
n on
18t
h Ju
ly, 2
011.
By
the
com
men
cem
ent o
f the
Pro
ject
, NP
A w
ill c
ompl
ete
the
ress
etle
men
t with
ME
WR
.(c
) N
PA
is p
repa
ring
the
sim
ple
RA
P w
ith M
EW
R.
(d)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t(e
) N
PA
is p
repa
ring
the
sim
ple
RA
P w
ith M
EW
R.
(f)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t(g
) N
PA
is p
repa
ring
the
sim
ple
RA
P w
ith M
EW
R.
(h)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t(i)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t(j)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t
(2)
Livi
ng a
ndLi
velih
ood
(a)
Is th
ere
a po
ssib
ility
that
the
proj
ect w
ill a
dver
sely
affe
ct th
e liv
ing
cond
ition
s of
inha
bita
nts?
Are
ade
quat
e m
easu
res
cons
ider
ed to
red
uce
the
impa
cts,
if n
eces
sary
?(b
) Is
ther
e a
poss
ibili
ty th
at d
isea
ses,
incl
udin
g in
fect
ious
dis
ease
s, s
uch
as H
IV w
ill b
e br
ough
t due
to im
mig
ratio
n of
wor
kers
ass
ocia
ted
with
the
proj
ect?
Are
ade
quat
e co
nsid
erat
ions
giv
en to
pub
lic h
ealth
, if
nece
ssar
y?(c
) Is
ther
e an
y po
ssib
ility
that
inst
alla
tion
of s
truc
ture
s, s
uch
as p
ower
line
tow
ers
will
cau
se a
rad
io in
terf
eren
ce?
If a
ny s
igni
fican
t rad
io in
terf
eren
ceis
ant
icip
ated
, are
ade
quat
e m
easu
res
cons
ider
ed?
(d)
Are
the
com
pens
atio
ns fo
r tr
ansm
issi
on w
ires
give
n in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
dom
estic
law
?
(a)
Yes
(b)
No
(c)
No
(d)
Unr
elat
ed
(a)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t(b
) S
ame
as A
ttach
men
t 1 E
nviro
nmen
tal C
heck
list
(c)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t(d
) S
ame
as A
ttach
men
t 1 E
nviro
nmen
tal C
heck
list
4 S
ocia
lE
nviro
nmen
t
7. Environmental Checklist and Monitoring Plan
A-7-6
Cat
egor
yE
nviro
nmen
tal
Item
Mai
n C
heck
Item
sS
tatu
sC
onfir
mat
ion
of E
nviro
nmen
tal C
onsi
dera
tions
(Rea
sons
, Miti
gatio
n M
easu
res)
(3)
Her
itage
(a)
Is th
ere
a po
ssib
ility
that
the
proj
ect w
ill d
amag
e th
e lo
cal
arch
eolo
gica
l, hi
stor
ical
, cul
tura
l, an
d re
ligio
us h
erita
ge?
Are
ade
quat
em
easu
res
cons
ider
ed to
pro
tect
thes
e si
tes
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
eco
untr
y’s
law
s?
(a)
No
(a)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t
(4)
Land
scap
e(a
) Is
ther
e a
poss
ibili
ty th
at th
e pr
ojec
t will
adv
erse
ly a
ffect
the
loca
lla
ndsc
ape?
Are
nec
essa
ry m
easu
res
take
n?(a
) N
o(a
) S
ame
as A
ttach
men
t 1 E
nviro
nmen
tal C
heck
list
(5)
Eth
nic
Min
oriti
es a
ndIn
dige
nous
Peo
ples
(a)
Are
con
side
ratio
ns g
iven
to r
educ
e im
pact
s on
the
cultu
re a
nd li
fest
yle
of e
thni
c m
inor
ities
and
indi
geno
us p
eopl
es?
(b)
Are
all
of th
e rig
hts
of e
thni
c m
inor
ities
and
indi
geno
us p
eopl
es in
rela
tion
to la
nd a
nd r
esou
rces
res
pect
ed?
(a)
Unr
elat
ed(b
) U
nrel
ated
(a)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t(b
) S
ame
as A
ttach
men
t 1 E
nviro
nmen
tal C
heck
list
(6)
Wor
king
Con
ditio
ns
(a)
Is th
e pr
ojec
t pro
pone
nt n
ot v
iola
ting
any
law
s an
d or
dina
nces
asso
ciat
ed w
ith th
e w
orki
ng c
ondi
tions
of t
he c
ount
ry w
hich
the
proj
ect
prop
onen
t sho
uld
obse
rve
in th
e pr
ojec
t?(b
) A
re ta
ngib
le s
afet
y co
nsid
erat
ions
in p
lace
for
indi
vidu
als
invo
lved
inth
e pr
ojec
t, su
ch a
s th
e in
stal
latio
n of
saf
ety
equi
pmen
t whi
ch p
reve
nts
indu
stria
l acc
iden
ts, a
nd m
anag
emen
t of h
azar
dous
mat
eria
ls?
(c)
Are
inta
ngib
le m
easu
res
bein
g pl
anne
d an
d im
plem
ente
d fo
rin
divi
dual
s in
volv
ed in
the
proj
ect,
such
as
the
esta
blis
hmen
t of a
saf
ety
and
heal
th p
rogr
am, a
nd s
afet
y tr
aini
ng (
incl
udin
g tr
affic
saf
ety
and
publ
iche
alth
) fo
r w
orke
rs e
tc.?
(d)
Are
app
ropr
iate
mea
sure
s ta
ken
to e
nsur
e th
at s
ecur
ity g
uard
sin
volv
ed in
the
proj
ect n
ot to
vio
late
saf
ety
of o
ther
indi
vidu
als
invo
lved
, or
loca
l res
iden
ts?
(a)
Yes
(b)
Und
er p
repa
ratio
n(c
) U
nder
pre
para
tion
(d)
Und
er p
repa
ratio
n
(a)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t(b
) S
ame
as A
ttach
men
t 1 E
nviro
nmen
tal C
heck
list
(c)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t(d
) S
ame
as A
ttach
men
t 1 E
nviro
nmen
tal C
heck
list
(1)
Impa
cts
durin
gC
onst
ruct
ion
(a)
Are
ade
quat
e m
easu
res
cons
ider
ed to
red
uce
impa
cts
durin
gco
nstr
uctio
n (e
.g.,
nois
e, v
ibra
tions
, tur
bid
wat
er, d
ust,
exha
ust g
ases
, and
was
tes)
?(b
) If
cons
truc
tion
activ
ities
adv
erse
ly a
ffect
the
natu
ral e
nviro
nmen
t(e
cosy
stem
), a
re a
dequ
ate
mea
sure
s co
nsid
ered
to r
educ
e im
pact
s?(c
) If
cons
truc
tion
activ
ities
adv
erse
ly a
ffect
the
soci
al e
nviro
nmen
t, ar
e
(a)
Und
er p
repa
ratio
n(b
) N
o(c
) U
nder
pre
para
tion
(a)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t(b
) S
ame
as A
ttach
men
t 1 E
nviro
nmen
tal C
heck
list
(c)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t
(2)
Mon
itorin
g
(a)
Doe
s th
e pr
opon
ent d
evel
op a
nd im
plem
ent m
onito
ring
prog
ram
for
the
envi
ronm
enta
l ite
ms
that
are
con
side
red
to h
ave
pote
ntia
l im
pact
s?(b
) W
hat a
re th
e ite
ms,
met
hods
and
freq
uenc
ies
of th
e m
onito
ring
prog
ram
?(c
) D
oes
the
prop
onen
t est
ablis
h an
ade
quat
e m
onito
ring
fram
ewor
k(o
rgan
izat
ion,
per
sonn
el, e
quip
men
t, an
d ad
equa
te b
udge
t to
sust
ain
the
mon
itorin
g fr
amew
ork)
?(d
) A
re a
ny r
egul
ator
y re
quire
men
ts p
erta
inin
g to
the
mon
itorin
g re
port
syst
em id
entif
ied,
suc
h as
the
form
at a
nd fr
eque
ncy
of r
epor
ts fr
om th
epr
opon
ent t
o th
e re
gula
tory
aut
horit
ies?
(a)
Und
er p
repa
ratio
n(b
) U
nder
pre
para
tion
(c)
Und
er p
repa
ratio
n(d
) Y
es
(a)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t(b
) S
ame
as A
ttach
men
t 1 E
nviro
nmen
tal C
heck
list
(c)
Sam
e as
Atta
chm
ent 1
Env
ironm
enta
l Che
cklis
t(d
) S
ame
as A
ttach
men
t 1 E
nviro
nmen
tal C
heck
list
6 N
ote
Not
e on
Usi
ngE
nviro
nmen
tal
Che
cklis
t
(a)
If ne
cess
ary,
the
impa
cts
to tr
ansb
ound
ary
or g
loba
l iss
ues
shou
ld b
eco
nfirm
ed, (
e.g.
, the
pro
ject
incl
udes
fact
ors
that
may
cau
se p
robl
ems,
such
as
tran
sbou
ndar
y w
aste
trea
tmen
t, ac
id r
ain,
des
truc
tion
of th
eoz
one
laye
r, o
r gl
obal
war
min
g).
(a)
Unr
elat
ed(a
) S
ame
as A
ttach
men
t 1 E
nviro
nmen
tal C
heck
list
1) R
egar
ding
the
term
“C
ount
ry’s
Sta
ndar
ds”
men
tione
d in
the
abov
e ta
ble,
in th
e ev
ent t
hat e
nviro
nmen
tal s
tand
ards
in th
e co
untr
y w
here
the
proj
ect i
s lo
cate
d di
verg
e si
gnifi
cant
ly fr
om in
tern
atio
nal s
tand
ard
appr
opria
te e
nviro
nmen
tal c
onsi
dera
tions
are
req
uire
d to
be
mad
e.
In c
ases
whe
re lo
cal e
nviro
nmen
tal r
egul
atio
ns a
re y
et to
be
esta
blis
hed
in s
ome
area
s, c
onsi
dera
tions
sho
uld
be m
ade
base
d on
com
paris
ons
with
app
ropr
iate
sta
ndar
ds o
f oth
er c
ount
ri (
incl
udin
g Ja
pan'
s ex
perie
nce)
2) E
nviro
nmen
tal c
heck
list p
rovi
des
gene
ral e
nviro
nmen
tal i
tem
s to
be
chec
ked.
It m
ay b
e ne
cess
ary
to a
dd o
r de
lete
an
item
taki
ng in
to a
ccou
nt th
e ch
arac
teris
tics
of th
e pr
ojec
t and
the
part
icul
ar c
ircum
stan
ces
of t
coun
try
and
loca
lity
in w
hich
it is
loca
ted
5 O
ther
s
4 S
ocia
lE
nviro
nmen
t
7. Environmental Checklist and Monitoring Plan
A-7-7
SIERRA LEONE BROADCASTING CORPORATION. NEW ENGLAND VILLE, FREETOWN. '.
23rd December 2010
The Permanent Secretary Ministry ofEnergy and Water Resources . El~ctricity House Siaka Stevens .Street Freetowll..
REOUEST FOR THE RELEASE OF A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED AT THE SLBC SITE IN GODERICH FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 33/11KV DISTRIBUTION
: SUBSTATION.
With reference to the above, I write to inform you that the Board of Trustees of the SLBC has given approval for the SLBC to release the parcel of land located at
i! the SLBC site in Goderich that has been identified by NPA for the construction of a 33/11KV distribution Substation.
As Partners in development, we consider your plan a good venture for the development of energy in Sierra Leone.
E. Gbanabom Hallowell Director General
cc: The Chainnan, Board ofTrustees, SLBC The Minister ofEnergy & Water Resources The Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Lands, Country Planning & the Environment The General Manager, NPA The Deputy General Manager, NPA
Website: www.slbc.sl 'YOV~'VOICE !M'Yo/OICE. Email: [email protected]
8. Approval Letter for usage of Land for Goderich Substation (SLBC→MEWR)
A-8-1