Bauer1981 Componentes Carbonatados en Ceniza Volante

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/18/2019 Bauer1981 Componentes Carbonatados en Ceniza Volante

    1/6

    Identification and Quantitation of Carbonate Compounds in Coal

    Fly Ash

    Christopher F. Bauert and David F

    S.

    Natusch'

    Department of Chemistry, Colorado State Un iversity, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523

    rn

    Alkali, alkaline earth, an d ferrous carbonates have been

    identified a nd q uantitatively d etermined in several coal fly

    ashes at total carbonate concentrations of 0.058-0.86%.

    Th erm al evolved gas analysis for Con, a selective acid-leaching

    proced ure for carbonates, and meta l analyses of th e leachates

    provide da ta for a mass balance between metals and carbon-

    ate. I n some cases the leachable metal comes predominantly

    from a ca rbonate species. High relative hu midity promoted

    COz absorp tion by fly ash regardless of th e COz partial pre s-

    sure. Although this study used ash removed by electrostatic

    precipitators, flue-gas characteristics ar e likely t o promo te

    carbonate formation on th e ash in the plume.

    The projected continued use of coal for power generation

    reaffirms the need to stud y particulate emissions from coal

    combustion, t o assess and, if possible, to m inimize adverse

    environm ental imp acts. Most stud ies ,have focused on th e

    behavior of potentially toxic metals

    1-41,

    organic compounds

    5 , 6 ) ,

    nd sulfur gases (7) with little information being gen-

    erated on the inorganic compounds present. Techniques

    giving compound-specific information have been ham pered

    by inade quate detection limits. Only major species have been

    unequivocally identified, primarily by X-r ay powder dif-

    fraction

    (8-10):

    quartz, mullite (3A1~03.2Si02),hematite,

    magnetite , h e , nd anhydrite (CaS0.d. X-ray photoelectron

    spectrometry (X PS ) has shown tha t binding energies for el-

    eme nts in fly ash are consistent with oxides for Al, Si, and Fe

    and with Cas 04 for Ca and S,but oth er compounds may have

    th e same binding energies 11,12).Evidence for sulfates of

    Al, Ca, and Fe has been provided by Fourier transform in-

    frared spectroscopy 13 ) . Differential thermal analysis has

    been ap plied widely t he m inerals in coal 14 )and to fly ash

    9),

    bu t t o our knowledge in only one instance were mixed

    carbonates of Ca, Mg, and F e found (15).

    Knowledge of the chemical forms of metals in fly ash is

    highly desirable in order t predict t he m obility of the metal.

    Mobility has implications for inhala tion toxicology and fly-ash

    disposal because both require information on solubility. In

    addition , utilization of ash

    as

    a raw material may benefit from

    more com plete information on ash chemistry.

    Th e present stu dy demonstrates that , in fact , carbonate

    compounds occur in fly ashes, th at th e concentrations of in-

    dividual comp ounds are trace level, and that the m etals bound

    as carbon ates can be a significant fraction of the totalmobile

    metal.

    t

    Present address: Water Chemistry Laboratory, University

    of

    Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706.

    Experimental Section

    Thermal Evolved as Analysis. Because carbonate

    minerals decompose with t he release of C02 a t characteristic

    temperatures

    16),

    volved gas analysis (EG A) with carbon-

    specific detection was applied. The instrumen t is illustrated

    in Figure 1.Th e furnace (L eco induction furnace, Model 521)

    was temperature-programmed from room temp erature t 1200

    OC a t -190 OC/min by means of a moto r-driven variable

    transformer (I7). Calibration of the tem perature scale was

    perform ed by using th e melting points of several pure solids

    a t th e stat ed programming rate. Ca. 100 mg of fly ash was

    spread in a th in layer (

  • 8/18/2019 Bauer1981 Componentes Carbonatados en Ceniza Volante

    2/6

    T M O l O

    C A V I T Y

    IH

    Flgure 1.Thermal evolved gas analysis instrument.

    DROPPING FUNNEL

    h

    C A V l T Y

    9

    H

    U

    Figure

    2.

    Acid evolved gas analysis system.

    Leaching Procedure.

    By controlling th e carbonate equi-

    librium w ith the am ount of acid added, it is possible

    to

    dissolve

    selectively the carbonate compounds a s a group. For a given

    am oun t of fly ash, we needed to determine the stoichiometric

    number

    of

    moles of acid to add and the duration of mixing

    required to assure complete dissolution. This was done easily

    with the acid EGA apparatus (Figure

    2).

    For 100 mg of fly ash (C orrette) the to tal amo unt of C02

    released by

    25

    mL of acid was determined for several con-

    centrations of acid a t a constan t mixing time of 10 min. If th e

    acid streng th is sufficient, the carbonate equilibrium will shift

    completely to gaseous COz. Th e CO z-release peak sha pe will

    reflect only mass-transfer effects and will be independen t of

    acid concentration. If,however, acid strength is too small, only

    part of the total carbonate will be present as

    COz,

    the rest

    existing as bicarbon ate or carbon ate ions. Eventually , as COz

    is purged, th e solution equilibrium will shift, releasing more

    COz, unt il equ ilibrium with t he COz level in helium is reached.

    T h e net effect is peak broadening and delay. One molar acid

    was chosen to assu re complete dissolution.

    Duration of mixing was addressed by mixing 25

    mL

    f

    1

    M

    HC1 with

    100

    mg of fly ash (C orre tte) for variable lengths of

    time before sweeping th e C0 2 out of the reaction cell. If dis-

    solution is complete, the peak width a nd th e time at peak

    maximum will be independent of mixing duration; for in-

    complete dissolutiofi the time a t peak maximum and peak

    width will increase with shorter mixing times because the COB

    generation

    is

    incomplete. Kinetic effects were absent after 10

    min of mixing.

    Metal Determinations.Iron was determined by atomic

    absorption spectrometry with background correction (Varian,

    Model 1250),

    Li

    and R b were determined by flame emission

    (Varian, Typ e AA-5), and t he rest of the metals were deter-

    mined by argon dc plasma emission using the Spectraspan I11

    Echelle spectrom eter (Sp ectraMetrics, Inc.). Th e first three

    elements were assayed by the met hod of stan dard addition s.

    Since the S pectraspan gives direct concentration readout, the

    results from i t were verified by stan dard a ddition s. All analyte

    solutions contained 1000 ppm Cs as an ionization suppres-

    sant.

    All thermal EGAs, acid EGAs, and leaching procedures

    were performed on duplicate samples of four

    fly

    ashes:

    Crawford and IGS from Illinois, Niagara from New York, and

    Corrette from Montana. In addition, IGS was separated into

    “magnetic” and “no nmagn etic” fractions by using a magnet.

    Th e ashes were obtained from hoppers beneath th e electro-

    static p recipitators and were sieved manually (Buckbee-Mears

    Co. sieves) to ob tain the

    2

    --

    C ORR

    E

    T T

    E

    CRAWFORD

    25

    600

    1200 25 600 1200

    Figure

    3.

    Thermal evolved gas analyses

    for

    carbon

    in

    fly

    ashes.

    TEMPERATURE ( ’ C )

    784

    Environmental Science

    &

    Technology

  • 8/18/2019 Bauer1981 Componentes Carbonatados en Ceniza Volante

    3/6

    Table 1 Comparison of Total Carbonate by Thermal

    and Acid Evolved Gas Analysis

    c%*-,'

    ppm

    dgnlflcant

    f ly

    a&

    thermal acld difference?

    Crawford

    230 0 (26) 4100 (49) no

    Niagara 1700 (32) 580 (39) no

    Corrette

    290 0 (22) 2400 (40) no

    IGS 5200 (27)

    8600 (52) no

    Percent relative average deviations

    are

    given

    in

    parentheses.

    calibration of the sensitivity of response has been minimal,

    th at only duplicate samp les of each ash were analyzed, and

    th at there may be considerable variability between the as h

    aliquots. For these reasons, the numerical results must be

    considered only semiquantitative. This interpretation is re-

    flected by the large relative deviations associated with the

    measured values. Consequ ently, th e differences between th e

    two EGA methods are no t significant. This indicates th at bo th

    yield reasonable estim ates of carbon ate content .

    Identification of the compounds contributing

    to

    each of the

    peaks in Figure

    3

    was obtained by running therm al EGA s of

    the carbonates of Fe, Li, Na, K , Rb , Mg, Ca,

    Sr,

    and Ba, some

    of which are show n in Figure

    4.

    Th e decomposition tem pera-

    tures

    of

    th e pure compounds were consistent with literature

    values allowing for use of a faster hea ting rat e 16 ,24 )herein,

    which shifts obseqved peak tem peratu res upward . All of the

    major and minor elements present in fly ash tha t form stable

    carbonates are included in this se t of standards. T he identi-

    fications are in Tabl e

    11.

    Bicarbona tes of Na an d K were also

    considered; however, since these compounds were found to

    release COz by decomposition to th e carbonates below

    -350

    C, their contribution to the fly-ash EGA profiles was con-

    sidered negligible, except perha ps for Crawford. Th is possi-

    25

    100 400

    8 0 0

    1200

    Figure 4.

    Thermal evolved gas ana lyses of alkaline earth carbon-

    ates.

    T E M P E R A T U R E r c )

    bility is acknowledged in Tab le I1 bu t is not included in the

    mass balance.

    For m ost bases several compounds may be contributo rs to

    each peak in t he EGA profile of th e fly ashes. Also listed ar e

    the amounts of carbonate represented by each peak. Some

    carbonates may, in fact, exist as mixed-metal mineral entities

    or alkaline ear th hydroxy carbonates. For most of these min-

    erals, th e

    COS

    elease temperatures are the sam e as those for

    the single-metal species within the t emp erature resolution of

    this instrum ent (see dolomite in Figure

    4).

    As a result, al-

    though specific mineral forms cannot be identified from t he

    COz evolution profiles, a given m etal may be associated w ith

    a specific COz peak, allowing a mass balance t o be perform ed.

    For example, a COZ

    peak

    around 8 OC could indicate calcite,

    dolomite, or ankerite, but in any case it does indicate an as-

    sociation between Ca a nd CO32-. H enceforth, reference to a

    particular metal carbonate refers to an association an d no t

    necessarily to a particular crystalline form. The only major

    mineral for which this app roach may fail is anke rite because

    its Fe com ponent decomposes

    -150

    OC higher than in pure

    FeC03.

    Th e leachate analyses a re presented in T able 111. For each

    element, the stoichiometric amo unt of carbonate th at

    it

    could

    bind was calculated and compared with th e C0 32- present

    (Table

    11)

    in the appro priate EG A peak. If leaching removed

    carbonates only, the sum of the contributions to each peak

    calculated from the metal determination s would equal th e

    carbonate determined by EGA in t ha t peak. In some cases,

    however, species in addi tion to carbon ates a re dissolved. Al-

    though t he m ass balance is imperfect, limits can be placed on

    Ta b 6 I I. Concentrat ions

    of

    Carbonate on

    Fly

    Ashes

    and Possible Counterions

    fly ash

    Crawford

    Niagara

    Cbrrette

    IGS

    IGS,

    Mag

    IGS, Nonmag

    reglon

    total

    1

    2

    3

    4

    total

    1

    2

    total

    1

    2

    3

    4

    total

    1

    2

    4

    total

    1

    2

    3

    4

    total

    1

    2

    3

    4

    cq2- a ppm

    2300 (26)

    18 (26)

    1400 (26)

    620 (26)

    250 (25)

    1700 (32)

    420 (26)

    290 (35)

    1000 (34)

    2900 (22)

    240 (23)

    1300 (22)

    540 (23)

    810 (24)

    5200 (27)

    230 (25)

    2300 (26)

    720 (29)

    1900 (27)

    5300 (22)

    290 (22)

    2600 (22)

    860 (22)

    1500 (24)

    3600 (22)

    210 (23)

    550 (23)

    890 (24)

    1900 (22)

    p o d b l e

    cou l

    e on8

    NaH,

    KH

    Mg,

    Ca, Fe

    Li

    Na,

    Rb,

    Sr

    K, Ba

    Fe, Mg

    Ca

    Li

    Na, K, Rb, Sr, Ba

    Fe

    Mg, Ca, Li

    Na, K ,

    Rb,

    Sr

    Ba

    Fe

    Mg,

    Ca,

    Sr,

    Li

    Na,

    K, Rb,

    Ba

    7

    Fe

    Mg, Ca, Sr, Li

    Na, K.

    Rb,

    Ba

    7

    Fe

    Mg, Ca,

    Li

    Sr,

    Ba, Na, K ,

    R b

    7

    Percent relative average

    deviations

    are

    given

    in

    parentheses.

    Volume

    15,

    Number

    7,

    July

    1981

    785

  • 8/18/2019 Bauer1981 Componentes Carbonatados en Ceniza Volante

    4/6

    the possible contributio ns from each metal (Tab le IV). An

    exam ple of th e calculation is instructive.

    Consider peak 3 of Corret te fly ash (Tab le 11), which con-

    tains contributions from Na, K, Rb, and Sr.Calculated from

    th e leachable metals in Ta ble 111, th e stoichiometric amoun ts

    of carbon ate tha t could be bound are 73,140,

  • 8/18/2019 Bauer1981 Componentes Carbonatados en Ceniza Volante

    5/6

    a t less than 1 .n mo st cases, th e carbonate is a significant

    fraction of the total leachable metal and for Na, K , and Ba

    may even rep rese nt all of th e leachable metal.

    To determ ine the conditions under which fly ash would

    ads orb COz, we decomposed all of the carb onates in a batc h

    of IGS ash by heating. Th e ash, which had p artly fused, was

    ground to a fine powder in a boron carbide mortar and pestle,

    and portions were stored under various conditions. Afterward,

    thermal EGAs were run to determine how much C02 had been

    readsorbed. Tab le VI lists the exposure conditions and car-

    bona te found. Th e capped bottle, representing dry exposure

    conditions, showed relatively little C02 uptake, even over a

    long period of time. Humid air, regardless of C 0 2 content,

    prom oted significant absorption of C02 after jus t

    1

    week.

    Apparently, humid atmospheres promote C02 adsorption.

    A further experiment supports this observation. IGS fly ash

    was leached with

    1M

    HCl, which has been shown to remove

    all carbonates, in air and inside a glovebox containing argon.

    A titrimetric method involving aqueous Ba(0 H) z absorption

    (27)

    demonstrated that the COz concentration was -0.5-1

    pp m on a volume basis. Air contains -350 ppm . Th e ash was

    recovered by filtration and dried, and a thermal EGA was run.

    Carrying out the leaching procedure in air yielded 0.73%

    Cos2-; performed under low-CO2 conditions,

    0.5

    C032 - was

    found.

    It is

    apparent tha t moisture facilitates the absorption of C02

    by fly ash despite low parti al pressures of COB.This obser-

    vation is consistent with studies of CaO and MgO, which in-

    dicate that limited chemisorption of COa occurs under dry

    conditi ons below 400OC  28,29). oisture, however, catalyzes

    the absorption even a t relative humidities as low as

    15

    (28).

    D i s c u s s i o n

    Th e occurrence of carbonates in fly ash is not surprising;

    however, it is importan t t o consider the significance of this

    observation. Since the ashes studied were obtained from

    electrostatic precipitator hopp ers, two questions arise:

    (1)

    Are

    the carbonates formed in the flue gas or in the hopper?

    (2)

    Can

    the analytical results for hopper ash be extrapolated to th e ash

    which reaches the atmospheric environment as pa rt of the

    plume? To answer these, the conditions within the power

    pla nt need to be considered.

    If

    one assumes the boiler to be fired with -20 excess air

    30),

    he volume percen t of C02 in th e flue gas will be 16% ,and

    th at of water vapor 7-10% (fo r air of 0-90 relative humidity).

    Ratios of

    H

    to C in coal were used to calculate th e lower value

    31).Th e fly ash leaving the boiler will be devoid of carbon ates

    since the tem perature and th e particle size opmineral car-

    bonates in coal allow very rapid decomposition

    10,32).

    We

    will use CaO

    as

    a model compound. Above -400 “C and below

    the decomposition temperature of CaC03, COz can be ad-

    sorbed rapidly a nd extensively by CaO

    (28)

    even though th e

    relative humidity is much less than

    1 .

    Much of the fly ash

    is removed in th e electrostatic precipitator where tempera -

    tures are -200 OC   33)and the relative humidity is

  • 8/18/2019 Bauer1981 Componentes Carbonatados en Ceniza Volante

    6/6

    (20) Beenakker, C. I. M. Spectrochirn. Acta, Part B , 1977, 32,

    173-87.

    (21) I. G. Farbenind. A&. Belgian Paten t 450 648, Jun e 1943; Chern.

    Abstr. 1947,41, P7063d.

    (22) Fisher, G. L.; Prentice, B. A.; Silberman, D.; Ondov, J. M.;

    Bierm ann, A. H.; Ragaini, R. C.; McFarland, A. R. Enuiron. Sci.

    Technol. 1978,12,447-51.

    (23) McCrone, Walter C.; Delly, John G. “T he Particle Atlas”, 2nd

    ed.; Ann Arbor Science Publishers: Ann A rbor, MI, 1973; Vol. 2, pp

    (24) Duval. C. “Inoreanic Thermoeravimetric Analvsis”: Elsevier:

    546-9.

    -

    “ ,

    New York, 1963.

    (25) Habashi. F . “Pr in ci de s of Extractive Metallurev”: Gordon

    Breach: New York, 1964; p 95.

    (26) Gibson, Everett K., Jr.; Johnson, Suzanne M. Thermochirn. Acta

    (27) Snell, F. D., Ettre, L. S., Eds. “Encyclopedia of Industrial

    Chem ical Analysis”; Interscience: New York, 1969 ; Vol. 8, p 261.

    1972,4,49-56.

    (28) Boynton, Robert S. “Chemistry an d Technology of Lime and

    Lim estone”; Interscience: New York, 1966; p 191.

    (29) Gregg, S. J.; Ramsay, J. D. J . Chern. SO C. 19 70 ,Il , 2784-7.

    (30) Sherm an, R. A,; Landry, B. A. In “Chemistry

    of

    Coal Utilization.

    Supp lem ent”; Lowry, H. H., E d.; Wiley: New Y ork, 1963; p 802.

    (31) Gluskoter, H. J.;Ruch, R . R.; M iller, W. G.; Cahill, R. A.; Dreh er,

    G. B.; Kuhn, J. K. Ill . St at e Geol. Suru. Circ. 1977,

    No.

    499.

    (32) Gallagher, P.

    K.;

    Johnson , D. W., Jr. Therrnochirn. Acta 1973,

    6 ,67 .

    (33) Ray,

    S. S.;

    Parker, F. G. “Characterization of Ash from Coal-

    Fired Power Plants”: U.S. Environmental Protection Amncv.

    _ .

    EPA-600/7-77-010,1977; p 87.

    College Park , M D, 1976.

    (34) Small, John A. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Maryland,

    (35) Gillott, J. E. J . Appl. Chern. 1967,17,185-9.

    Received for review April 3,1979. Accepted M arch 2,19 81,

    Determination

    of

    the Biodegradability

    of

    Organic Compounds

    Dickson Liu,* Wil l iam M J. Strachan, Karen Thomson, and Kazim iera Kwasniews ka

    Environmental Contaminants Division, N ational Water Res earch Institute, Canada Centre for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario,

    Canada L7R

    4A6

    w

    A standard procedure and a new app aratus for determining

    the relative biodegradability of both water-soluble and -in-

    soluble organic compoun ds under various laboratory envi-

    ronmental conditions has been developed. The degradation

    test system is based on the me asurement of the primary bio-

    degradation rates of such substances in cyclone fermentors

    under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, with and without

    cometabolites. Th e degradation is accomplished with a mix-

    tur e of microorganisms from activ ated sludge, soil, an d sedi-

    ments, and abiotic processes are corrected for by the use of

    controls. Fenitrothion

    O,O-dimethyl-O- 3-methyl-4-

    nitrophenyl) phosphorothioate) and 2,4-D ((2,4-dichloro-

    phenoxy)acetic acid) were tested in the system. The former

    was found to be more readily degraded under anaerobic

    cometabolism co nditions

    Tl/2

    = 1.0 day) than when the sam e

    system was aerobic T1/2= 5.5 day s); when fenitro thion was

    th e sole carbon source (me tabolism ), its stability was greater

    still, especially under aerobic conditions. The herbicide 2,4-D

    was easily degraded und er aerobic conditions T1/2=

    1.8

    and

    3.1 days for cometabolism and metabolism, respectively);

    however, under anaerobic conditions, its degradation rate was

    greatly decreased

    Tl/z

    =

    69

    and 135 days, respectively) to th e

    point where the rates were comparable to those of abiotic

    processes. Th e precision of the t est system w as checked with

    aniline and found to be f3 2 % elative standard deviation on

    T1/2= 0.21 day for aerobic cometabolism.

    Introduction

    Th e fate of synthe tic organic compounds in the environ-

    men t is an area of interna tional concern since the contami-

    nation of natural waters with these man-m ade substances has

    constituted a major impact on aquatic ecosystems and hence

    represents a serious problem to the management of water

    quality. Therefore, it is app ropriate to examine for biodeg-

    radability of organic compound s, many of which may be ex-

    pected to enter the aquatic environments in the course of their

    use or ultim ate disposal. Such an examination is required as

    an integ ral part of the hazard ev aluation of new chemicals and

    in one form or another is proposed in the toxic substances

    legislation testing schem es

    of

    many of th e world’s industrial

    nations.

    Because of th e many variables involved, it is impractical to

    study the persistence of such compounds in all natural envi-

    ronments, and consequently several standard laboratory

    procedures have been developed for the assessment of a

    compound’s persistence 1-4). Th e shaker flask system of the

    OECD te st used a chemically defined mineral mediu m with

    the t est substance as th e carbon and energy source

    for

    the

    microorganisms

    I

    . In a different system, Gledhill employed

    a continuous-flow activated sludge system representative of

    a treatmen t plant o peration for the evaluation of a substance’s

    persistence (2).Stu rm developed a screening test for the as-

    sessment of th e biodegradability of nonionic sur fact ant s by

    following the C 0 2 evolution 3) .The model ecosystem of

    Metcalf et al. was basically an aquarium with terrestrial-

    aquatic interface and a seven-element food chain

    4 ) .

    Unfor-

    tunate ly, examination of all of these tests reveals tha t there

    are basic differences in th e degradation environments und er

    which the t est substances are idvestigated. As a result, com-

    parison between different studies in the literature is extremely

    difficult, and m uch of the dat a have only limited value with

    regard to assessing the relative stability of chemicals. For

    example, the p ersistence of 2,4-D in soils has been reported

    to be between 4 weeks and 3 yr 5 ) , eflecting the impact of

    anoxic conditions on th e chemical’s persistence. T his p artic-

    ular problem is further compounded by th e fact that certain

    compound s, such as DD T, do not provide a suitable sole source

    of carbon and energy to su ppo rt microbial growth (metabo-

    lism) and consequently other organic nutrients are needed to

    support the biodegradation microorganisms (cometabolism),

    a fact which is frequently ignored in test systems. Another

    common drawback in interpreting most persistence studies

    788 Environmental S cience

    &

    Technology

    0013-936X/81/0915-0788 01.25/0 @

    1981 American Chemical Society