9
Predicting Rural Mountain Energy Consumption Based on Substation, Weather, Geography and Tourism Data By: Jeremy Moore

NRLP Practicum Presentation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: NRLP Practicum Presentation

Predicting Rural Mountain Energy Consumption Based

on Substation, Weather, Geography and Tourism

DataBy: Jeremy Moore

Page 2: NRLP Practicum Presentation

Introduction

• Peak power refers to the total power consumption when total power usage is at its highest for a given period of time. • Peak power usage is approximately 300 times more expensive per

kWh than non-peak power. • Peak power tends to be the dirtiest source of energy. • The impact of peak power necessitates the isolation and

understanding of conditions that indicate peak power usage. • The focus of my work was to develop power prediction capability

for our town particularly when we are at peak, so we know where to address and lower the town’s consumption.

Page 3: NRLP Practicum Presentation

Project Objectives & Constraints

• Isolate where to address and lower the town’s power consumption when at peak consumption.• Look for correlation between substations.•Develop equation to predict power consumption, while

incorporating daily weather forecast data to alert proper channels of upcoming, high consumption days.• Identify variables that significantly drive power consumption.

Page 4: NRLP Practicum Presentation

Methods

• Acquisitioned total KWH usage data for each of the region’s five substations in hour intervals 2007-2015• Brought in weather data for 2007-2015• Condensed hourly KWH interval readings into daily substation totals, which was

matched with corresponding weather data• Constructed a correlation table to examine the relationship of each substation• Discovered minimal correlation between some substations• Compared substations based on geographic location• Four variables were common drivers for all equations: temperature variable,

percent change from previous day’s average temperature, previous three day’s average temperature and next three day’s average temperature• The variables identified in our model demonstrate an R2 > .80, except for

substation one• Weather, trend and seasonal variables explained high amounts of the variation

in energy consumption

Page 5: NRLP Practicum Presentation

Geographical Map

Rural Residential Established Neighborhood

Campus

Central Business

Medical Offices

Page 6: NRLP Practicum Presentation

5 Substation Description and Correlation

Page 7: NRLP Practicum Presentation

Weather, Trend, Seasonality Algorithm:

Campus = β0 + β1temperature variable + β2from previous day’s temperature + β3previous 3 day’s avg temp + β4next 3 day’s avg temp + β5 from previous day avg temp +

Page 8: NRLP Practicum Presentation

Predicted Consumption (Fitted Values) vs. Actual Consumption (Campus)

Page 9: NRLP Practicum Presentation

Conclusion

• Absolute value of the difference between the average daily temperature and yearly temperature mean, average of previous 3 days average temperature, and average of next three days average temperature were drivers for all substations except Central Business, which may be driven by other variables. • The effect of each driver in relation to power consumption may assist in

marketing behavioral change to reduce costs for local businesses and consumers. Therefore, the next step to improve our model will be to include other variables that may influence energy consumption, including: tourism events, football games, school schedules, geographic conditions and festivals.• We can use our model, in tandem with our peak day prediction model, to

predict energy consumption for the mountain region and decrease energy consumption during high-cost periods.• After predicting power consumption and alerting proper channels, incentives

may be offered to residents to reduce energy usage during specific time intervals to drive cost savings.